Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. SPAM commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Buy and SPAM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 69.3B vs. SPAM (6.45M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: SMH (57.868) vs SPAM (39.443). SMH was incepted earlier than SPAM: SMH (15 years) vs SPAM (3 years). SMH (0.35) and SPAM (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . SPAM has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| SMH | SPAM | SMH / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 57.868 | 39.443 | 147% |
| Net Assets | 69.3B | 6.45M | 1,074,752% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 38.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 0.33 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.47% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and TENB have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and TENB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| TENB - SPAM | 29% Poorly correlated | -5.99% | ||
| FTNT - SPAM | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.32% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.99% | ||
More | ||||