Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. SPAM commentary
Oct 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Buy and SPAM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ONEY | 124.11 | 1.19 | +0.97% |
| State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) | |||
| UPW | 18.05 | 0.15 | +0.84% |
| ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) | |||
| MMSC | 26.86 | 0.09 | +0.34% |
| First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) | |||
| LMBS | 48.53 | 0.07 | +0.14% |
| First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF (LMBS) | |||
| JA | 50.05 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF (JA) | |||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +3.03% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPAM has been loosely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPAM jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| TENB - SPAM | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| FTNT - SPAM | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||