Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Annualized Return+34%
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. SPAM commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and SPAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 62.4B vs. SPAM (4.75M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: SMH (49.640) vs SPAM (31.809). SMH was incepted earlier than SPAM: SMH (15 years) vs SPAM (3 years). SMH (0.35) and SPAM (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . SPAM has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| SMH | SPAM | SMH / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 49.640 | 31.809 | 156% |
| Net Assets | 62.4B | 4.75M | 1,312,579% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 38.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 0.17 | 0.36 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Annualized Return+34%
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +6.88% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +17.98% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +5.96% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +14.97% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | +6.50% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +18.36% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and TENB have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and TENB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | +1.78% | ||
| TENB - SPAM | 18% Poorly correlated | +3.40% | ||
| FTNT - SPAM | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 13% Poorly correlated | +4.87% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.26% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.65% | ||
More | ||||