Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. SPAM commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and SPAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 68.8B vs. SPAM (5.05M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: SMH (69.830) vs SPAM (28.326). SMH was incepted earlier than SPAM: SMH (15 years) vs SPAM (3 years). SMH (0.35) and SPAM (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . SPAM has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| SMH | SPAM | SMH / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 69.830 | 28.326 | 247% |
| Net Assets | 68.8B | 5.05M | 1,363,726% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 38.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 0.17 | 0.36 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 23 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JHMM | 74.61 | 0.22 | +0.30% |
| JHancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | |||
| IBGK | 23.51 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Trsy ETF | |||
| ICLO | 25.60 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF | |||
| GLIN | 46.01 | -0.17 | -0.37% |
| VanEck India Growth Ldrs ETF | |||
| PLU | 19.39 | -0.66 | -3.29% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long PL ETF | |||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ASML - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MPWR - SMH | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and TENB have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and TENB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | N/A | ||
| TENB - SPAM | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OSPN - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| FTNT - SPAM | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHKP - SPAM | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||