SMH
Price
$553.11
Change
-$19.89 (-3.47%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
67.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTEQ
Price
$41.48
Change
-$0.69 (-1.64%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
440.02M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMH vs TTEQ

SMH vs TTEQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) vs. T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ)

Key Takeaways

  • SMH is a passive ETF tracking a semiconductor-specific index with approximately 25 holdings, while TTEQ is an actively managed fund providing broader exposure to global technology companies with around 75-85 holdings.
  • SMH offers concentrated exposure to the semiconductor industry, with top holdings heavily weighted toward companies like NVDA, TSM, and AVGO, whereas TTEQ diversifies across a wider range of technology sectors including software, hardware, and services.
  • Expense ratios differ notably: SMH charges 0.35%, making it more cost-efficient for long-term passive investors, compared to TTEQ's higher 0.63% fee associated with active management.
  • SMH focuses exclusively on semiconductor production and equipment firms, resulting in higher sector concentration and volatility tied to chip cycles, while TTEQ targets companies deriving the majority of revenue from technology, offering potentially lower single-industry risk.
  • Both ETFs align with AI and digital transformation themes, but SMH provides purer play exposure to semiconductor demand drivers, and TTEQ emphasizes growth-oriented technology leaders with active stock selection.
  • Structural differences position SMH for investors seeking thematic semiconductor bets and TTEQ for those preferring active oversight in a broader technology allocation.

Introduction

SMH and TTEQ represent distinct approaches to technology investing amid ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence, data centers, and digital infrastructure. SMH delivers targeted exposure to the semiconductor sector through a passive index strategy, while TTEQ employs active management for broader technology opportunities. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary or alternative ways for investors to gain technology sector exposure, with SMH emphasizing hardware enablers and TTEQ spanning a wider array of tech-enabled businesses. The comparison highlights structural contrasts relevant for portfolio construction in the current market environment.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

SMH is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index before fees and expenses. The index focuses on the 25 largest U.S.-listed companies involved in semiconductor production and equipment. The fund typically holds around 25-26 securities, resulting in a concentrated portfolio. Top holdings often include NVDA (approximately 20-22%), TSM (around 9-10%), AVGO (about 6%), AMD, and MU, with the top 10 comprising roughly 70% of assets. Sector allocation is almost entirely within semiconductors. The expense ratio stands at 0.35%. As a passive, market-cap-weighted product, it rebalances according to index methodology, providing liquid exposure to U.S.-listed semiconductor leaders with some international representation through depositary receipts.

T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) Overview

TTEQ is an actively managed ETF launched in late 2024 that seeks long-term capital growth by investing in global technology companies, with at least 80% of assets in firms generating the majority of revenue from technology or technology enablement. The fund typically holds 75-85 securities, offering broader diversification than narrow thematic peers. The top 10 holdings represent approximately 48-50% of assets, led by NVDA (around 11%), with additional positions across hardware, software, and services. Sector exposure spans the information technology space rather than semiconductors alone. The expense ratio is 0.63%, reflecting active management costs. TTEQ employs fundamental research for stock selection, targeting both established large-cap leaders and emerging innovators, including recent initial public offerings where appropriate.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure, cloud computing, and semiconductor advancements. Capital flows into AI-related themes have supported growth across hardware and software segments in recent market cycles. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate expectations, corporate capital expenditure on digital transformation, and supply chain developments in chip manufacturing. Regulatory considerations around export controls and competition policy influence semiconductor and broader tech firms. Risks encompass valuation pressures in high-growth names, potential slowdowns in consumer electronics, and geopolitical tensions affecting global supply chains. Both ETFs operate within this environment, though SMH's narrow focus amplifies sensitivity to semiconductor-specific cycles while TTEQ's broader mandate provides some buffering through diversified tech exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SMH has exhibited higher volatility consistent with its concentrated semiconductor focus and sensitivity to chip demand fluctuations tied to AI buildouts and electronics cycles. TTEQ, with its active management and wider technology holdings, has shown relatively moderated movements through sector rotation and stock selection. Performance drivers for SMH center on earnings strength among leading semiconductor producers, while TTEQ benefits from active adjustments across technology subsectors amid shifting interest rate outlooks and commodity trends. Relative positioning favors SMH for investors prioritizing pure semiconductor momentum and TTEQ for those seeking active oversight to navigate broader tech volatility and opportunities in recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest edge to SMH due to its lower expense ratio, established passive framework, and precise alignment with semiconductor sector momentum. TTEQ offers valuable active diversification within broader technology but carries higher costs and a shorter track record. The preference remains probabilistic and depends on individual risk tolerance and allocation goals rather than constituting investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SMH vs. TTEQ commentary
Aug 29, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and TTEQ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 67.9B vs. TTEQ (440M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TTEQ: SMH (59.109) vs TTEQ (29.659). SMH was incepted earlier than TTEQ: SMH (15 years) vs TTEQ (2 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than TTEQ (0.63). TTEQ has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
SMHTTEQSMH / TTEQ
Gain YTD59.10929.659199%
Net Assets67.9B440M15,432%
Total Expense Ratio0.350.6356%
Turnover12.0029.0041%
Yield0.200.00-
Fund Existence15 years2 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMHTTEQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTEQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARTMX35.600.12
+0.34%
Artisan Mid Cap Investor
RSINX19.12N/A
N/A
Victory RS Investors A
SBACX31.85N/A
N/A
Touchstone Balanced C
SSFRX573.01N/A
N/A
State Street Equity 500 Index R
GSTOX25.18N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts Inv

TTEQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTEQ has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTEQ jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTEQ
1D Price
Change %
TTEQ100%
+2.42%
ASML - TTEQ
76%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
ENTG - TTEQ
75%
Closely correlated
+2.00%
AMD - TTEQ
75%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
LSCC - TTEQ
74%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
NVDA - TTEQ
71%
Closely correlated
+8.74%
More