The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
SMH | |
Gain YTD | 19.870 |
Net Assets | 27.1B |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 |
Turnover | 15.00 |
Yield | 0.37 |
Fund Existence | 14 years |
SMH | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GDL | 8.53 | 0.03 | +0.35% |
GDL Fund (The) | |||
RBUF | 28.34 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
Innovator U.S. Small Cp 10 Buf ETF - Qt | |||
HELO | 64.18 | -0.12 | -0.19% |
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Ldrd Ovrly ETF | |||
HPS | 14.78 | -0.03 | -0.20% |
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III | |||
GSIB | 46.42 | -0.11 | -0.23% |
Themes Global Systemically Imp Bks ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SMH | 100% | -2.87% | ||
NVDA - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -3.32% | ||
LRCX - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -3.79% | ||
KLAC - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
TSM - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More |