Ad is loading...
SMMD vs USVM
SMMD vs USVM Comparison
Open Charts SMMD vs USVM
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$71.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
Volume$195
Net Assets1.43B
VictoryShares US Sm Md Cp Val Momt ETF
Price$87.53
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
Volume$100
Net Assets831.66M
SMMD vs USVM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMMD vs. USVM commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMMD is a Hold and USVM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.43B vs. USVM (832M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than USVM: SMMD (4.353) vs USVM (3.895). SMMD was incepted earlier than USVM: SMMD (8 years) vs USVM (7 years). USVM has a higher turnover SMMD (11.00) vs SMMD (11.00).
| SMMD | USVM | SMMD / USVM | |
| Gain YTD | 4.353 | 3.895 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 832M | 172% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 126.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 1.32 | 1.26 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMMD | USVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 80% | 16 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 16 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 16 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 86% | 21 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 17 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
More | ||||
USVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USVM has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USVM jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USVM | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| UFPI - USVM | 83% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| TPH - USVM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| TMHC - USVM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| CCS - USVM | 79% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| KBH - USVM | 78% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||