Advertisement
SND vs USAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SND is a Buy and USAC is a Buy.
SND | USAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
USAC's Valuation (6) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SND (64) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that USAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SND’s over the last 12 months.
USAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as SND (44) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that USAC’s stock grew similarly to SND’s over the last 12 months.
USAC's SMR Rating (12) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for SND (84) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that USAC’s stock grew significantly faster than SND’s over the last 12 months.
SND's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as USAC (52) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that SND’s stock grew similarly to USAC’s over the last 12 months.
USAC's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as SND (98) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that USAC’s stock grew similarly to SND’s over the last 12 months.
| SND | USAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while USAC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- SND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- USAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USAC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- USAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SND (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -3.79% price change this week, while USAC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
SND is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
USAC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-2.49% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DBEF | 55.14 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) | |||
| EMOP | 51.47 | -0.18 | -0.35% |
| AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) | |||
| SEEM | 39.16 | -0.24 | -0.61% |
| SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) | |||
| THIR | 33.60 | -0.27 | -0.80% |
| THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) | |||
| CIFG | 4.74 | -0.12 | -2.42% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG) | |||
SND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SND has been loosely correlated with USAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SND jumps, then USAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SND | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| USAC - SND | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| TTI - SND | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| DNOW - SND | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| XPRO - SND | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| HAL - SND | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||
USAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAC has been loosely correlated with TTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USAC jumps, then TTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USAC | 100% | -1.16% | ||
| TTI - USAC | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| AROC - USAC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| DNOW - USAC | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| FET - USAC | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| HAL - USAC | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||