SOLCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.72M
STJPF
Price
$11.00
Change
-$1.30 (-10.57%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.63B
Ad is loading...

SOLCF vs STJPF

Header iconSOLCF vs STJPF Comparison
Open Charts SOLCF vs STJPFBanner chart's image
Sol Global Invts
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$57.01K
Capitalization4.72M
St. James Place Capital
Price$11.00
Change-$1.30 (-10.57%)
Volume$650
Capitalization6.63B
SOLCF vs STJPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SOLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SOLCF vs. STJPF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOLCF is a Hold and STJPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (SOLCF: $0.05 vs. STJPF: $12.30)
Brand notoriety: SOLCF and STJPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SOLCF: 154% vs. STJPF: 11%
Market capitalization -- SOLCF: $4.72M vs. STJPF: $6.63B
SOLCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.72M. STJPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SOLCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTJPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SOLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STJPF is a better buy in the long-term than SOLCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SOLCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SOLCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

SOLCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -32.25% price change this week, while STJPF (@Investment Managers) price change was -7.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STJPF($6.63B) has a higher market cap than SOLCF($4.72M). STJPF has higher P/E ratio than SOLCF: STJPF (16.00) vs SOLCF (0.37). STJPF YTD gains are higher at: 39.932 vs. SOLCF (-77.467). STJPF has more cash in the bank: 6.68B vs. SOLCF (465K). SOLCF has less debt than STJPF: SOLCF (24.2M) vs STJPF (316M). STJPF has higher revenues than SOLCF: STJPF (12.4B) vs SOLCF (-168.88M).
SOLCFSTJPFSOLCF / STJPF
Capitalization4.72M6.63B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-77.46739.932-194%
P/E Ratio0.3716.002%
Revenue-168.88M12.4B-1%
Total Cash465K6.68B0%
Total Debt24.2M316M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SOLCF vs STJPF: Fundamental Ratings
SOLCF
STJPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5182
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10090
SMR RATING
1..100
9925
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9261
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOLCF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as STJPF (87). This means that SOLCF’s stock grew similarly to STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SOLCF (100). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SOLCF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOLCF (99). This means that STJPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOLCF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SOLCF (65). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SOLCF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SOLCF (92). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to SOLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SOLCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SOLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WFDAX23.59N/A
N/A
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
JDBRX44.40N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Balanced R
LGMCX22.89N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation C
TVRVX23.40N/A
N/A
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Investor
BFIUX17.55N/A
N/A
Baron FinTech R6

SOLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOLCF and JBARF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOLCF and JBARF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOLCF
1D Price
Change %
SOLCF100%
-6.72%
JBARF - SOLCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - SOLCF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RMGOF - SOLCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RESCU - SOLCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STJPF - SOLCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STJPF and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STJPF and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJPF
1D Price
Change %
STJPF100%
N/A
HRZN - STJPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
SLFPF - STJPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
SLFPY - STJPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TETAA - STJPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.90%
More