SOS vs WALD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOS is a Hold and WALD is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SOS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WALD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SOS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WALD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
| SOS | WALD | SOS / WALD | |
| Capitalization | 26.4M | 794M | 3% |
| EBITDA | -35.3M | -17.21M | 205% |
| Gain YTD | -17.836 | -29.851 | 60% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.54 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 358M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 338M | 99.7K | 339,017% |
| Total Debt | 2.81M | 2.1M | 134% |
SOS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SOS | WALD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 10 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WLCIX | 13.68 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| Allspring Large Company Value Inst | |||
| FRBSX | 34.24 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value A | |||
| FCGMX | 19.26 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| NYLI PineStone Global Equity Class R6 | |||
| VSCRX | 54.35 | -0.07 | -0.13% |
| Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core R6 | |||
| FVWSX | 23.85 | -0.06 | -0.25% |
| Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights | |||
WALD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WALD and SOS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WALD and SOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WALD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WALD | 100% | +4.44% | ||
| SOS - WALD | 28% Poorly correlated | +21.65% | ||
| GBTG - WALD | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.00% | ||
| AFRM - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | -14.47% | ||
| RXT - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | -12.85% | ||
| BTDR - WALD | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.28% | ||
More | ||||