Advertisement
GBTG vs WALD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBTG is a Hold and WALD is a StrongBuy.
| GBTG | WALD | GBTG / WALD | |
| Capitalization | 4.94B | 169M | 2,924% |
| EBITDA | 368M | -7.95M | -4,631% |
| Gain YTD | 23.660 | -30.319 | -78% |
| P/E Ratio | 59.13 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.18B | 240M | 1,323% |
| Total Cash | 518M | 19.7M | 2,629% |
| Total Debt | 1.6B | 188M | 851% |
| GBTG | WALD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 18 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 73% | 16 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 82% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GBTG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while WALD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GBTG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WALD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GBTG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WALD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GBTG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WALD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GBTG (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while WALD (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -4.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
GBTG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
WALD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (-1.36% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
@Household/Personal Care (-3.19% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSLC | 145.80 | 1.24 | +0.86% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US LgCp Eq ETF | |||
| XMPT | 20.57 | 0.07 | +0.35% |
| VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | |||
| MYMG | 24.74 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
| State Street® My2027 Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| AMUN | 26.05 | N/A | +0.02% |
| abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Inc Act ETF | |||
| BRTR | 48.68 | -0.07 | -0.14% |
| iShares Total Return Active ETF | |||
WALD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WALD and SOS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WALD and SOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WALD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WALD | 100% | -1.50% | ||
| SOS - WALD | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.58% | ||
| GBTG - WALD | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| MAGN - WALD | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| AFRM - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +5.07% | ||
| RXT - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.88% | ||
More | ||||