Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPAM vs VGT
SPAM vs VGT Comparison
Open Charts SPAM vs VGT
SPAM vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPAM vs. VGT commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPAM is a Hold and VGT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 170B vs. SPAM (5.05M). SPAM has a higher annual dividend yield than VGT: SPAM (28.326) vs VGT (23.653). SPAM was incepted earlier than VGT: SPAM (3 years) vs VGT (22 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than SPAM (0.35). SPAM has a higher turnover VGT (8.00) vs VGT (8.00).
| SPAM | VGT | SPAM / VGT | |
| Gain YTD | 28.326 | 23.653 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 5.05M | 170B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.09 | 389% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 8.00 | 475% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.36 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SPAM | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and TENB have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and TENB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | N/A | ||
| TENB - SPAM | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OSPN - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| FTNT - SPAM | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHKP - SPAM | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
VGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGT has been loosely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VGT jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGT | 100% | +1.51% | ||
| ONTO - VGT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| COHR - VGT | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| FN - VGT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| VSH - VGT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| PENG - VGT | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||