| SPAM | VGT | SPAM / VGT | |
| Gain YTD | 31.809 | 20.688 | 154% |
| Net Assets | 4.75M | 169B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.09 | 389% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 8.00 | 475% |
| Yield | 0.36 | 0.36 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 23 years | - |
| SPAM | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GVIP | 169.07 | 8.70 | +5.43% |
| Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | |||
| SGOL | 39.14 | 0.63 | +1.64% |
| abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | |||
| ABNG | 20.21 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long Abnb Daily ETF | |||
| EVX | 40.43 | -0.08 | -0.20% |
| VanEck Environmental Svcs ETF | |||
| HWSM | 31.56 | -0.20 | -0.62% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Divers Val Fd | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and TENB have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and TENB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | +1.78% | ||
| TENB - SPAM | 18% Poorly correlated | +3.40% | ||
| FTNT - SPAM | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 13% Poorly correlated | +4.87% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.26% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.65% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGT has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VGT jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGT | 100% | +4.97% | ||
| ONTO - VGT | 68% Closely correlated | +14.75% | ||
| COHR - VGT | 63% Loosely correlated | +12.16% | ||
| VSH - VGT | 62% Loosely correlated | +12.78% | ||
| FN - VGT | 61% Loosely correlated | +5.99% | ||
| GLW - VGT | 60% Loosely correlated | +9.00% | ||
More | ||||