Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPAM vs XLK
SPAM vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts SPAM vs XLK
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$32.33
Change+$0.39 (+1.22%)
Volume$1.25K
Net Assets1.91M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$238.36
Change+$2.23 (+0.94%)
Volume$4.51M
Net Assets73.85B
SPAM vs XLK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPAM vs. XLK commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPAM is a Buy and XLK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 73.8B vs. SPAM (1.91M). SPAM has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: SPAM (10.090) vs XLK (2.692). SPAM was incepted earlier than XLK: SPAM (2 years) vs XLK (26 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SPAM (0.35). XLK has a higher turnover SPAM (9.00) vs SPAM (9.00).
| SPAM | XLK | SPAM / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 10.090 | 2.692 | 375% |
| Net Assets | 1.91M | 73.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.08 | 438% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 19.00 | 47% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 0.67 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SPAM | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 79% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 77% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OSCV | 35.81 | 0.47 | +1.33% |
| Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | |||
| BUFB | 33.00 | 0.26 | +0.79% |
| Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF | |||
| FLRN | 30.71 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| SPDR® Blmbg Inv Grd Flt Rt ETF | |||
| ESIX | 28.82 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | |||
| FXB | 130.07 | -0.37 | -0.28% |
| Invesco CcyShrs® British Pound Stlg | |||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPAM has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPAM jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | +1.21% | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| CYBR - SPAM | 71% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| ZS - SPAM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| S - SPAM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| TENB - SPAM | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||