Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPAM vs XLK
SPAM vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts SPAM vs XLK
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$33.31
Change+$0.51 (+1.55%)
Volume$150
Net Assets1.96M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$256.96
Change+$3.34 (+1.32%)
Volume$3.56M
Net Assets80.13B
SPAM vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPAM vs. XLK commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPAM is a Hold and XLK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 80.1B vs. SPAM (1.96M). SPAM has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: SPAM (13.438) vs XLK (10.888). SPAM was incepted earlier than XLK: SPAM (2 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SPAM (0.35). XLK has a higher turnover SPAM (24.00) vs SPAM (24.00).
| SPAM | XLK | SPAM / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 13.438 | 10.888 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 1.96M | 80.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.08 | 438% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 39.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 0.11 | 0.61 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SPAM | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPYI | 50.75 | 0.26 | +0.51% |
| NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF | |||
| CBSE | 36.85 | N/A | N/A |
| Clough Select Equity ETF | |||
| BGJTF | 9.92 | N/A | N/A |
| Baillie Gifford Japan Trust Plc. (The) | |||
| RLY | 29.51 | -0.07 | -0.22% |
| SPDR® SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | |||
| GBF | 103.69 | -0.24 | -0.23% |
| iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | |||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPAM has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPAM jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | +1.58% | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 75% Closely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| CYBR - SPAM | 71% Closely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| ZS - SPAM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| S - SPAM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.63% | ||
More | ||||