Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SPAM vs XLK
SPAM vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts SPAM vs XLK
SPAM vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPAM vs. XLK commentary
Oct 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPAM is a Buy and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SPAM | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EAD | 6.01 | N/A | N/A |
| Allspring Income Opportunities Fund | |||
| NRES | 33.25 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
| Xtrackers Rreef Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) | |||
| DTCR | 27.07 | -0.07 | -0.26% |
| Global X Data Center And Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) | |||
| CSNR | 35.98 | -0.13 | -0.35% |
| Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) | |||
| GLDN | 15.41 | -0.10 | -0.67% |
| Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) | |||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPAM has been loosely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPAM jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| TENB - SPAM | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| FTNT - SPAM | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with QRVO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then QRVO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| QRVO - XLK | 69% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| COHR - XLK | 65% Loosely correlated | +10.90% | ||
| GLW - XLK | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.33% | ||
| KEYS - XLK | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| ANET - XLK | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
More | ||||