SPBC
Price
$46.76
Change
-$0.75 (-1.58%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
42.74M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WGMI
Price
$70.98
Change
-$1.00 (-1.39%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
394.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPBC vs WGMI

SPBC vs WGMI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Simplify US Equity PLUS Bitcoin Strategy ETF (SPBC) vs. CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI)

Key Takeaways

  • SPBC combines broad U.S. equity exposure with targeted Bitcoin holdings, while WGMI concentrates exclusively on Bitcoin mining companies and related service providers.
  • SPBC maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.54% compared to WGMI’s 0.75%, offering a modest cost advantage for long-term investors.
  • SPBC features a highly concentrated portfolio centered on a core S&P 500 ETF and a Bitcoin exchange-traded product, whereas WGMI holds approximately 27 securities with top positions in specialized miners.
  • Sector exposure in SPBC mirrors broad U.S. market allocations with heavy technology weighting, while WGMI tilts toward financial services and technology firms engaged in Bitcoin mining operations.
  • Both ETFs provide distinct access points to the Bitcoin ecosystem—SPBC through direct digital asset exposure layered on equities, and WGMI through operational leverage to mining economics and network activity.
  • Structural differences position SPBC as a hybrid equity-digital asset vehicle and WGMI as a pure-play thematic fund, resulting in varying risk profiles tied to equity market cycles versus mining-specific volatility.

Introduction

SPBC and WGMI both offer investors exposure to Bitcoin-related themes yet pursue fundamentally different strategies. SPBC layers direct Bitcoin holdings onto a core U.S. equity portfolio, while WGMI targets the operational side of the Bitcoin network through mining companies. These ETFs do not compete directly but instead provide complementary or alternative routes for investors seeking Bitcoin ecosystem participation alongside traditional equity or sector-specific risk. In the current environment of evolving digital asset adoption and regulatory clarity, comparing their structures helps clarify suitable positioning within diversified portfolios.

Simplify US Equity PLUS Bitcoin Strategy ETF (SPBC) Overview

The Simplify US Equity PLUS Bitcoin Strategy ETF (SPBC) is an actively managed fund that seeks capital appreciation by allocating approximately 100% of assets to U.S. equities—primarily through an S&P 500 ETF such as IVV—while overlaying roughly 10% exposure to Bitcoin via exchange-traded products like the VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL). The fund typically holds only a handful of positions, resulting in extreme concentration. Its expense ratio stands at 0.54%. SPBC employs a hybrid approach that blends passive equity beta with active Bitcoin allocation adjustments, distinguishing it from pure equity or pure crypto vehicles. Sector allocations broadly track large-cap U.S. equities, featuring significant technology, financial services, and communication services weightings.

CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) Overview

The CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) is an actively managed fund that invests at least 80% of its assets in companies deriving the majority of revenue or profits from Bitcoin mining operations or from supplying specialized hardware, software, and services to miners. The ETF holds approximately 27 securities, with top positions including Cipher Mining (CIFR), IREN Limited (IREN), and TeraWulf (WULF). Its expense ratio is 0.75%. Sector allocations concentrate in financial services and technology, reflecting the business models of listed mining operators. WGMI provides targeted thematic exposure without direct Bitcoin holdings, emphasizing operational leverage to network hash rate, energy costs, and mining economics.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the expanding Bitcoin and digital asset ecosystem. Key macro drivers include institutional adoption of Bitcoin as a treasury asset, regulatory developments surrounding spot products, and energy market dynamics that influence mining profitability. Capital flows into Bitcoin-related strategies have accelerated during periods of favorable monetary policy expectations and technological advancements in mining efficiency. Risks encompass regulatory uncertainty, volatility in Bitcoin prices, competition among miners, and potential shifts in energy costs or environmental policies affecting operations. The thematic backdrop favors vehicles that balance direct digital asset exposure with equity market participation or specialized operational exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SPBC has exhibited behavior closely aligned with broad U.S. equity indices augmented by Bitcoin price movements, resulting in moderate volatility relative to pure crypto assets. WGMI has demonstrated higher sensitivity to Bitcoin mining-specific factors, including hash rate growth, halving events, and energy price fluctuations, often producing more pronounced swings during sector rotations. Relative positioning shows SPBC benefiting from equity market stability and direct Bitcoin upside, while WGMI captures leveraged upside during periods of strong mining margins and network expansion. Differences in volatility profiles stem from SPBC’s diversified equity foundation versus WGMI’s concentrated operational focus.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and balanced risk exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to SPBC. Its lower expense ratio, hybrid equity-Bitcoin construction, and broad market participation provide a more resilient framework across varied market regimes compared with WGMI’s concentrated mining focus, though both remain viable depending on an investor’s specific Bitcoin thesis and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SPBC vs. WGMI commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPBC is a Hold and WGMI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WGMI has more net assets: 394M vs. SPBC (42.7M). WGMI has a higher annual dividend yield than SPBC: WGMI (85.472) vs SPBC (4.819). SPBC was incepted earlier than WGMI: SPBC (5 years) vs WGMI (4 years). SPBC (0.54) has a lower expense ratio than WGMI (0.75). WGMI has a higher turnover SPBC (30.00) vs SPBC (30.00).
SPBCWGMISPBC / WGMI
Gain YTD4.81985.4726%
Net Assets42.7M394M11%
Total Expense Ratio0.540.7572%
Turnover30.0040.0075%
Yield0.820.00-
Fund Existence5 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPBCWGMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WGMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSOAX37.240.21
+0.57%
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class A
JHQRX34.83N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity R6
HMSIX13.62N/A
N/A
Hennessy Midstream Institutional
PIIJX17.91N/A
N/A
Principal Diversified Intl J
BGEFX14.08-0.41
-2.81%
Baillie Gifford International Growth 4

WGMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WGMI has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WGMI jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WGMI
1D Price
Change %
WGMI100%
-1.39%
CIFR - WGMI
91%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
IREN - WGMI
87%
Closely correlated
-3.73%
HUT - WGMI
86%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
RIOT - WGMI
84%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
CLSK - WGMI
83%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
More