SPBC and WGMI both offer investors exposure to Bitcoin-related themes yet pursue fundamentally different strategies. SPBC layers direct Bitcoin holdings onto a core U.S. equity portfolio, while WGMI targets the operational side of the Bitcoin network through mining companies. These ETFs do not compete directly but instead provide complementary or alternative routes for investors seeking Bitcoin ecosystem participation alongside traditional equity or sector-specific risk. In the current environment of evolving digital asset adoption and regulatory clarity, comparing their structures helps clarify suitable positioning within diversified portfolios.
The Simplify US Equity PLUS Bitcoin Strategy ETF (SPBC) is an actively managed fund that seeks capital appreciation by allocating approximately 100% of assets to U.S. equities—primarily through an S&P 500 ETF such as IVV—while overlaying roughly 10% exposure to Bitcoin via exchange-traded products like the VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL). The fund typically holds only a handful of positions, resulting in extreme concentration. Its expense ratio stands at 0.54%. SPBC employs a hybrid approach that blends passive equity beta with active Bitcoin allocation adjustments, distinguishing it from pure equity or pure crypto vehicles. Sector allocations broadly track large-cap U.S. equities, featuring significant technology, financial services, and communication services weightings.
The CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) is an actively managed fund that invests at least 80% of its assets in companies deriving the majority of revenue or profits from Bitcoin mining operations or from supplying specialized hardware, software, and services to miners. The ETF holds approximately 27 securities, with top positions including Cipher Mining (CIFR), IREN Limited (IREN), and TeraWulf (WULF). Its expense ratio is 0.75%. Sector allocations concentrate in financial services and technology, reflecting the business models of listed mining operators. WGMI provides targeted thematic exposure without direct Bitcoin holdings, emphasizing operational leverage to network hash rate, energy costs, and mining economics.
Both ETFs operate within the expanding Bitcoin and digital asset ecosystem. Key macro drivers include institutional adoption of Bitcoin as a treasury asset, regulatory developments surrounding spot products, and energy market dynamics that influence mining profitability. Capital flows into Bitcoin-related strategies have accelerated during periods of favorable monetary policy expectations and technological advancements in mining efficiency. Risks encompass regulatory uncertainty, volatility in Bitcoin prices, competition among miners, and potential shifts in energy costs or environmental policies affecting operations. The thematic backdrop favors vehicles that balance direct digital asset exposure with equity market participation or specialized operational exposure.
In recent market cycles, SPBC has exhibited behavior closely aligned with broad U.S. equity indices augmented by Bitcoin price movements, resulting in moderate volatility relative to pure crypto assets. WGMI has demonstrated higher sensitivity to Bitcoin mining-specific factors, including hash rate growth, halving events, and energy price fluctuations, often producing more pronounced swings during sector rotations. Relative positioning shows SPBC benefiting from equity market stability and direct Bitcoin upside, while WGMI captures leveraged upside during periods of strong mining margins and network expansion. Differences in volatility profiles stem from SPBC’s diversified equity foundation versus WGMI’s concentrated operational focus.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.
Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and balanced risk exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to SPBC. Its lower expense ratio, hybrid equity-Bitcoin construction, and broad market participation provide a more resilient framework across varied market regimes compared with WGMI’s concentrated mining focus, though both remain viable depending on an investor’s specific Bitcoin thesis and risk tolerance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| SPBC | WGMI | SPBC / WGMI | |
| Gain YTD | 4.819 | 85.472 | 6% |
| Net Assets | 42.7M | 394M | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.75 | 72% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 40.00 | 75% |
| Yield | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 4 years | - |
| SPBC | WGMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WGMI has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WGMI jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WGMI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WGMI | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| CIFR - WGMI | 91% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| IREN - WGMI | 87% Closely correlated | -3.73% | ||
| HUT - WGMI | 86% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| RIOT - WGMI | 84% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| CLSK - WGMI | 83% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
More | ||||