SPCO
Price
$1.02
Change
-$0.01 (-0.97%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
SSDOF
Price
$19.00
Change
-$0.60 (-3.06%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

SPCO vs SSDOF

Header iconSPCO vs SSDOF Comparison
Open Charts SPCO vs SSDOFBanner chart's image
The Stephan
Price$1.02
Change-$0.01 (-0.97%)
Volume$8K
CapitalizationN/A
Shiseido
Price$19.00
Change-$0.60 (-3.06%)
Volume$4.6K
CapitalizationN/A
SPCO vs SSDOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SPCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SPCO vs. SSDOF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPCO is a Hold and SSDOF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (SPCO: $1.02 vs. SSDOF: $19.00)
Brand notoriety: SPCO and SSDOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SPCO: 547% vs. SSDOF: 49%
Market capitalization -- SPCO: $7.23M vs. SSDOF: $17.68B
SPCO [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $7.23M. SSDOF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $17.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $24.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SPCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSDOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SPCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSDOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPCO is a better buy in the long-term than SSDOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPCO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSDOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SPCO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SSDOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSDOF is a better buy in the short-term than SPCO.

Price Growth

SPCO (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.97% price change this week, while SSDOF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-3.48% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSDOF($17.7B) has a higher market cap than SPCO($7.23M). SPCO YTD gains are higher at: -13.541 vs. SSDOF (-26.641). SSDOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 133B vs. SPCO (1.25M). SSDOF has more cash in the bank: 119B vs. SPCO (717K). SPCO has less debt than SSDOF: SPCO (24K) vs SSDOF (313B). SSDOF has higher revenues than SPCO: SSDOF (1.07T) vs SPCO (7.99M).
SPCOSSDOFSPCO / SSDOF
Capitalization7.23M17.7B0%
EBITDA1.25M133B0%
Gain YTD-13.541-26.64151%
P/E RatioN/A66.23-
Revenue7.99M1.07T0%
Total Cash717K119B0%
Total Debt24K313B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPCO vs SSDOF: Fundamental Ratings
SPCO
SSDOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
686
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5884
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
892
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSDOF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SPCO (76). This means that SSDOF’s stock grew similarly to SPCO’s over the last 12 months.

SSDOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SPCO (100). This means that SSDOF’s stock grew similarly to SPCO’s over the last 12 months.

SPCO's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSDOF (86). This means that SPCO’s stock grew significantly faster than SSDOF’s over the last 12 months.

SPCO's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SSDOF (84). This means that SPCO’s stock grew similarly to SSDOF’s over the last 12 months.

SSDOF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SPCO (89). This means that SSDOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SPCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPCOSSDOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SPCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FWIFX35.75-0.39
-1.08%
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide I
IRMTX10.84-0.40
-3.56%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port S2
VSIAX85.23-3.35
-3.78%
Vanguard Small Cap Value Index Admiral
BRSJX14.84-0.63
-4.07%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq I
ZVGNX50.71-2.73
-5.11%
Zevenbergen Genea Investor

SPCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPCO and RBGPF have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPCO and RBGPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPCO
1D Price
Change %
SPCO100%
N/A
RBGPF - SPCO
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBGLY - SPCO
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
SSDOY - SPCO
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
UNCHF - SPCO
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
UNICY - SPCO
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More

SSDOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSDOF has been loosely correlated with EL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSDOF jumps, then EL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSDOF
1D Price
Change %
SSDOF100%
N/A
EL - SSDOF
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.12%
KSRYY - SSDOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
SSDOY - SSDOF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
SKVI - SSDOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-33.22%
SPCO - SSDOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More