SPEM
Price
$50.46
Change
-$0.73 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
17.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VWO
Price
$57.72
Change
-$0.73 (-1.25%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
162.82B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPEM vs VWO

Header iconSPEM vs VWO Comparison
Open Charts SPEM vs VWOBanner chart's image
SPEM vs VWO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) vs. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)

Key Takeaways

  • Both SPEM and VWO offer low-cost passive exposure to emerging markets equities, with expense ratios of 0.07% and 0.06%, respectively, making them efficient choices for long-term diversification.
  • SPEM tracks the S&P Emerging BMI Index with approximately 3,000 holdings, while VWO follows the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index with over 4,900 holdings, providing VWO broader small-cap exposure.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly, led by TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor) at around 13%, followed by Tencent and Alibaba, reflecting heavy tech and consumer discretionary tilts.
  • Sector allocations are similar: technology (~28-30%), financials (~20%), and consumer cyclical (~10%), but country weights differ slightly due to index methodologies.
  • VWO excludes South Korea (classified as developed by FTSE), potentially leading to higher India and Brazil allocations compared to SPEM.
  • Both exhibit comparable liquidity with tight bid-ask spreads (~0.02%) and high daily volumes, suitable for institutional and retail investors.

Introduction

Comparing SPEM and VWO is relevant for investors seeking cost-effective access to emerging markets (EM) equities amid shifting global capital flows and macroeconomic divergence. These ETFs compete directly as core EM building blocks, tracking broad indices of large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks across developing economies. While sharing similar sector exposures dominated by technology and financials, subtle differences in benchmark construction—such as country classifications and China A-share inclusion—affect relative positioning. In the current environment of U.S. dollar softening, AI-driven growth in Asia, and renewed EM inflows, they offer alternatives for diversification beyond developed markets, balancing growth potential against geopolitical and currency risks.

SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) Overview

The SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM), managed by State Street Global Advisors, is a passive ETF seeking to track the S&P Emerging BMI Index, a float-adjusted market-cap-weighted benchmark measuring the investable universe of emerging market equities across large-, mid-, and small-caps. Launched in 2007, it holds approximately 2,986 securities with assets under management (AUM, a measure of total fund size) around $18 billion.

Top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) at 13.5%, Tencent Holdings at 2.9%, and Alibaba at 2.5%. Sector allocations emphasize information technology (30%), financials (20%), consumer discretionary (10%), materials (8%), and industrials (8%). The fund rebalances periodically to reflect index changes, maintaining broad diversification while minimizing turnover. With an expense ratio of 0.07%, tight 30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.02%, and strong average daily volume, SPEM offers excellent liquidity as part of State Street's low-cost Portfolio ETF suite.

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) Overview

The Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO), issued by Vanguard, passively tracks the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, a market-cap-weighted index covering large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks in emerging markets, including partial China A-shares. Established in 2005, it features over 4,900 holdings and substantial AUM exceeding $120 billion.

Leading positions mirror SPEM with TSM at ~13%, Tencent at 3.6%, and Alibaba at 2.6%, alongside Reliance Industries and HDFC Bank. Key sectors include technology (26%), financial services (21%), consumer cyclical (11%), and basic materials (8%). The index incorporates China A-shares for enhanced onshore exposure and rebalances quarterly. VWO's 0.06% expense ratio, combined with high liquidity (average spreads ~0.02% and robust volume), positions it as a staple for broad EM allocation in diversified portfolios.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Emerging markets equities face a dynamic environment shaped by macroeconomic divergence, with EM growth outpacing developed economies amid declining U.S. interest rates and dollar weakness. Capital flows have surged into EM ETFs, driven by AI optimism boosting Taiwan and India tech leaders, stabilizing China policies, and commodity tailwinds for Brazil and South Africa. Regulatory progress on China A-shares enhances accessibility, while sector rotation favors technology (semiconductors) and financials.

Risks persist from geopolitical tensions (e.g., U.S.-China trade), currency volatility, and sensitivity to global risk sentiment. Recent cycles highlight EM resilience during dollar softening, with inflows exceeding $35 billion into EM funds early in the year before risk-off pauses. Macro drivers like improving EM fundamentals (lower inflation, higher yields) and diversification demand support positioning, though political instability in key markets warrants caution.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, SPEM and VWO have shown tight tracking, with annualized returns over multi-year cycles around 17% (3-year) and 6% (5-year), reflecting shared EM dynamics. Relative performance hinges on index nuances: SPEM's S&P benchmark may edge in tech-heavy rallies due to South Korea inclusion (classified emerging by S&P), while VWO benefits from deeper small-cap and China A exposure during risk-on phases.

Volatility profiles align, with betas ~0.8 versus U.S. markets, but VWO's broader holdings offer marginal diversification edge. Positioning favors both amid sector momentum in semiconductors (TSM) and financial earnings cycles, tempered by interest rate expectations and commodity trends. Geopolitical shifts have amplified dispersion, underscoring relative strength in Asia over Latin America in recent market cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (total value of outstanding shares), technical indicators like moving averages, price patterns including breakouts, and performance metrics like relative strength. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and discovery process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI leans toward VWO with moderate conviction (55-60% probability edge), citing its marginally lower expense ratio, superior diversification via more holdings and all-cap focus, and consistent trend alignment in recent EM cycles. SPEM remains competitive on cost and liquidity, but VWO's structural breadth and China A inclusion better position it for sustained sector momentum and risk-adjusted exposure. Observable factors favor VWO for core allocations, though blending both optimizes index divergence.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SPEM vs. VWO commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPEM is a Buy and VWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWO has more net assets: 163B vs. SPEM (17.4B). VWO has a higher annual dividend yield than SPEM: VWO (8.724) vs SPEM (7.819). SPEM was incepted earlier than VWO: SPEM (19 years) vs VWO (21 years). VWO (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than SPEM (0.07). VWO has a higher turnover SPEM (1.00) vs SPEM (1.00).
SPEMVWOSPEM / VWO
Gain YTD7.8198.72490%
Net Assets17.4B163B11%
Total Expense Ratio0.070.06117%
Turnover1.006.0017%
Yield2.482.43102%
Fund Existence19 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPEMVWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSY50.200.01
+0.02%
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
RMNY24.59-0.04
-0.18%
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
LQTI19.20-0.04
-0.19%
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
DMA7.42-0.02
-0.27%
Destra Multi-Alternative Fund
NCV16.93-0.08
-0.47%
Virtus Convertible & Income Fund

VWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VWO has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VWO jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VWO
1D Price
Change %
VWO100%
+0.21%
JD - VWO
71%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
BILI - VWO
71%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
BIDU - VWO
68%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
BABA - VWO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
BZ - VWO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
More