SPMO
Price
$152.60
Change
-$1.74 (-1.13%)
Updated
Jun 24, 03:44 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
22.29B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VOO
Price
$675.72
Change
-$0.62 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.7T
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPMO vs VOO

SPMO vs VOO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) vs. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)

Key Takeaways

  • SPMO employs a momentum-based strategy selecting approximately 100 stocks from the S&P 500 Index with the strongest recent price performance, while VOO provides broad market-cap-weighted exposure to all 500 constituents of the S&P 500 Index.
  • SPMO maintains a higher expense ratio of 0.13% compared to VOO’s 0.03%, reflecting the added costs of active factor screening versus passive indexing.
  • Sector allocations differ notably, with SPMO exhibiting greater concentration in technology and industrials due to momentum signals, whereas VOO delivers balanced exposure across all major sectors of the U.S. large-cap market.
  • SPMO’s narrower holdings profile introduces higher concentration risk and potential for elevated volatility relative to VOO’s diversified 500-stock portfolio.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and rebalanced according to their respective index methodologies, with SPMO’s semi-annual adjustments capturing shifting momentum trends and VOO’s quarterly rebalancing maintaining market-cap proportionality.
  • VOO offers superior liquidity and lower trading costs owing to its significantly larger assets under management, making it suitable for core long-term allocations.

Introduction

Investors seeking U.S. large-cap equity exposure often evaluate broad market benchmarks alongside factor-tilted strategies. SPMO and VOO both draw from the S&P 500 Index yet pursue distinct objectives: one emphasizes recent price momentum, while the other seeks comprehensive market representation. This comparison highlights structural differences in index methodology, cost structure, diversification, and risk characteristics. The ETFs do not compete directly but instead offer complementary approaches for investors balancing growth-oriented factor exposure with market-wide participation in the current environment of sector rotation and macroeconomic uncertainty.

Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) Overview

The Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF (SPMO) tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index, which selects and weights approximately 100 stocks from the S&P 500 Index demonstrating the highest momentum scores based on recent price performance adjusted for volatility. The fund holds roughly 100 securities, with notable concentration in technology names such as Micron Technology and NVIDIA. Sector exposure tilts heavily toward technology and industrials. SPMO carries an expense ratio of 0.13% and follows a passive rules-based strategy with semi-annual rebalancing to reflect updated momentum rankings. This factor-focused structure distinguishes it from traditional market-cap indexes by systematically overweighting stocks exhibiting positive price trends.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Overview

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) tracks the S&P 500 Index, providing market-cap-weighted exposure to approximately 500 of the largest U.S. companies. Holdings span all major sectors with no single industry dominating beyond natural market weights. VOO maintains an expense ratio of 0.03% and operates as a fully passive fund with quarterly rebalancing to align with index constituent changes. Its structure prioritizes broad diversification and low-cost access to the overall U.S. large-cap equity market, serving as a foundational holding for many portfolios.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. large-cap equity market continues to experience sector rotation driven by artificial intelligence advancements, interest rate expectations, and corporate earnings trends. Technology remains a dominant theme, influencing momentum signals and overall index performance. Capital flows favor both broad-market and factor-based products amid ongoing macroeconomic developments, including potential shifts in monetary policy. Regulatory scrutiny of large technology firms and geopolitical tensions introduce risks that may affect concentrated holdings more acutely than diversified portfolios. These dynamics underscore the relevance of comparing momentum-tilted and broad-market strategies within the S&P 500 ecosystem.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SPMO has demonstrated sensitivity to momentum-driven rallies, particularly in technology and growth-oriented segments, resulting in periods of outperformance during strong trending markets. VOO has delivered more consistent returns aligned with overall S&P 500 movements, exhibiting lower volatility due to its broader diversification. Relative positioning highlights SPMO’s potential for amplified gains in momentum-favorable environments alongside greater drawdown risk, while VOO provides steadier participation across economic conditions. Sector rotation favoring technology has supported SPMO’s profile, whereas VOO benefits from balanced exposure that mitigates single-sector volatility over extended periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to enhance your research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, VOO presents a compelling profile for broad, cost-efficient exposure with lower volatility and superior liquidity. SPMO offers differentiated momentum exposure that may appeal in specific market regimes but carries higher fees and concentration risk. On balance, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probability to VOO for core portfolio allocations due to its diversification, cost efficiency, and consistent market representation across varying conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SPMO vs. VOO commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPMO is a Buy and VOO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOO has more net assets: 1.7T vs. SPMO (22.3B). SPMO has a higher annual dividend yield than VOO: SPMO (29.915) vs VOO (7.856). SPMO was incepted earlier than VOO: SPMO (11 years) vs VOO (16 years). VOO (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than SPMO (0.13). SPMO has a higher turnover VOO (2.00) vs VOO (2.00).
SPMOVOOSPMO / VOO
Gain YTD29.9157.856381%
Net Assets22.3B1.7T1%
Total Expense Ratio0.130.03433%
Turnover44.002.002,200%
Yield0.671.0366%
Fund Existence11 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPMOVOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPMO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VOO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LLYX23.840.21
+0.89%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF
IBDU23.110.02
+0.09%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corp ETF
KOCT37.06-0.07
-0.19%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct
EZRO24.90-0.84
-3.25%
AlphaDroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF
GMF155.09-5.61
-3.49%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Em AsiaPac ETF

SPMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMO has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMO jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPMO
1D Price
Change %
SPMO100%
-4.53%
LRCX - SPMO
73%
Closely correlated
-9.33%
KLAC - SPMO
69%
Closely correlated
-9.17%
AMAT - SPMO
68%
Closely correlated
-8.48%
AVGO - SPMO
68%
Closely correlated
-3.06%
ETN - SPMO
67%
Closely correlated
-7.00%
More