SPXL
Price
$251.65
Change
-$5.88 (-2.28%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
6.49B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UYM
Price
$30.73
Change
-$0.18 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
40.71M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPXL vs UYM

SPXL vs UYM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) vs. ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM)

Key Takeaways

  • SPXL delivers 3x daily exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index through a leveraged structure, while UYM provides 2x daily exposure to the narrower S&P Materials Select Sector Index.
  • SPXL offers diversified large-cap U.S. equity exposure with significant technology sector weighting, whereas UYM concentrates on cyclical materials companies including chemicals, metals, and mining.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leverage, making them suitable for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies due to potential compounding effects.
  • SPXL maintains a lower net expense ratio of 0.84% compared to UYM's 0.95%, with substantially higher liquidity and assets under management.
  • SPXL tracks approximately 500 holdings via derivatives to achieve broad market beta, while UYM uses a more concentrated portfolio of around 30 holdings focused on the materials sector.
  • Relative positioning favors SPXL for investors seeking amplified broad-market participation, whereas UYM suits those targeting materials sector-specific momentum.

Introduction

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) and ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM) represent distinct leveraged strategies that appeal to investors seeking amplified exposure. SPXL targets broad large-cap U.S. equities, while UYM focuses narrowly on the materials sector. These ETFs do not compete directly but provide alternative leveraged approaches within the equity market, allowing investors to express views on overall market direction versus cyclical commodity-related industries. In the current environment of shifting sector rotations and macroeconomic uncertainty, understanding their structural differences helps clarify suitable positioning.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) Overview

SPXL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund uses swap agreements, futures, and other derivatives to achieve its leveraged objective rather than holding the underlying securities directly. It maintains approximately 500 holdings reflective of the broad S&P 500 composition. Top holdings mirror large-cap technology leaders such as NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft. Sector allocations are dominated by information technology, followed by financials, consumer discretionary, and health care. The net expense ratio stands at 0.84%. As a passive leveraged product from Direxion, it resets daily and suits short-term tactical trading rather than extended holding periods.

ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM) Overview

UYM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of the S&P Materials Select Sector Index. The ETF employs derivatives including swaps to deliver twice the daily return of the underlying materials benchmark. It holds a concentrated portfolio of approximately 30 securities focused on chemicals, metals, mining, and related industries. Notable holdings include Linde and other materials producers. Sector exposure is almost entirely within materials. The net expense ratio is 0.95%. Issued by ProShares, the fund resets leverage daily and is designed for short-term use, with limited diversification outside its targeted sector.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The broader U.S. equity market continues to be influenced by technology-driven growth alongside cyclical sectors sensitive to economic expansion, commodity prices, and interest rate expectations. Materials companies face exposure to industrial demand, global trade dynamics, and input cost fluctuations. Capital flows into leveraged products often increase during periods of strong market trends or sector-specific catalysts such as infrastructure spending or supply-chain shifts. Regulatory developments around derivatives usage in ETFs remain stable, while macroeconomic drivers including inflation trends and corporate earnings in cyclical industries shape relative performance between broad-market and sector-focused strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SPXL has exhibited higher volatility consistent with its 3x leverage applied to the broad S&P 500, amplifying both gains and losses during equity rallies and corrections. UYM has shown distinct sensitivity to materials sector rotations, commodity price movements, and industrial production data. Relative positioning highlights SPXL's greater correlation to overall market sentiment and large-cap earnings trends, while UYM offers targeted exposure to cyclical recovery themes. Liquidity profiles favor SPXL significantly for larger position sizing without substantial market impact.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into leveraged ETFs like SPXL and UYM may benefit from exploring these capabilities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including broader diversification, slightly lower expense ratio, superior liquidity, and alignment with prevailing large-cap equity momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favorability to SPXL over UYM for investors seeking leveraged equity exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SPXL vs. UYM commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPXL is a Hold and UYM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXL has more net assets: 6.49B vs. UYM (40.7M). UYM has a higher annual dividend yield than SPXL: UYM (25.843) vs SPXL (14.561). SPXL was incepted earlier than UYM: SPXL (18 years) vs UYM (19 years). SPXL (0.84) has a lower expense ratio than UYM (0.95). SPXL has a higher turnover UYM (42.00) vs UYM (42.00).
SPXLUYMSPXL / UYM
Gain YTD14.56125.84356%
Net Assets6.49B40.7M15,943%
Total Expense Ratio0.840.9588%
Turnover71.0042.00169%
Yield0.521.2342%
Fund Existence18 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPXLUYM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UYM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGZ2.050.17
+9.04%
Vista Gold Corp
MOBX2.020.09
+4.66%
Mobix Labs Inc.
IDT57.341.42
+2.54%
IDT Corp
TMO513.037.28
+1.44%
Thermo Fisher Scientific
RYN21.910.03
+0.14%
Rayonier

SPXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPXL has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPXL jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXL
1D Price
Change %
SPXL100%
-2.28%
MSFT - SPXL
63%
Loosely correlated
+5.71%
AAPL - SPXL
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.14%
AMZN - SPXL
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
META - SPXL
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
NVDA - SPXL
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
More

UYM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UYM has been closely correlated with CC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UYM jumps, then CC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UYM
1D Price
Change %
UYM100%
-0.59%
CC - UYM
79%
Closely correlated
-2.90%
ESI - UYM
77%
Closely correlated
-4.32%
CMC - UYM
76%
Closely correlated
-6.60%
AA - UYM
74%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
WLK - UYM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
More