Investors seeking amplified daily exposure to U.S. equities often compare leveraged ETFs that target broad market indices versus thematic sectors. SPXL and WEBL do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they represent distinct strategies—one delivering leveraged broad-market large-cap exposure and the other targeting the internet and digital economy. This comparison helps clarify how structural differences in benchmarks, diversification, and cost structures influence their roles in tactical portfolios amid evolving market cycles.
SPXL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund holds approximately 500 positions through a combination of equity securities, swaps, and other derivatives to achieve its leveraged objective. Top holdings typically include leading technology and consumer names such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector allocations feature prominent weights in information technology (around 38%), financials (approximately 12%), communication services, and consumer discretionary. The net expense ratio stands at 0.84%. As a passive, rules-based leveraged product, it resets exposure daily, resulting in performance that can deviate significantly from three times the benchmark over periods longer than one day.
WEBL targets daily results equal to 300% of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, which comprises roughly 40 of the largest and most liquid U.S. internet companies. Holdings concentrate in firms deriving the majority of revenue from online retail, advertising, cloud computing, and digital platforms. Representative top positions include Amazon, Meta Platforms, Cisco Systems, Alphabet, and Arista Networks. Sector exposure emphasizes technology services, interactive media and services, communications equipment, and broadline retail. The net expense ratio is 0.96%. Like its counterpart, the fund uses derivatives for leverage and undergoes daily rebalancing, limiting its suitability for buy-and-hold strategies.
The technology and internet sectors continue to face macroeconomic influences including interest rate expectations, artificial intelligence investment cycles, and regulatory scrutiny on data privacy and competition. Broad large-cap equities benefit from diversified earnings across multiple industries, while internet-focused companies remain sensitive to digital advertising trends, cloud adoption rates, and consumer spending on e-commerce. Capital flows into thematic leveraged products have varied with market sentiment, though both segments exhibit elevated volatility during periods of shifting growth outlooks or policy changes.
In recent market cycles, SPXL has reflected the broader S&P 500 trajectory with amplified daily moves, providing exposure to a mix of growth and value-oriented large caps. WEBL has demonstrated greater sensitivity to internet subsector rotations, often experiencing sharper swings tied to earnings from key digital platforms and infrastructure providers. The broader diversification in SPXL tends to moderate extreme drawdowns relative to the concentrated thematic focus of WEBL, though both products exhibit substantial volatility due to leverage and daily reset mechanics.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF analysis.
Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and liquidity characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to SPXL. Its lower expense ratio, broader benchmark exposure, and significantly higher trading volume support more consistent execution across varying market environments compared with the narrower thematic concentration and higher costs associated with WEBL.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| SPXL | WEBL | SPXL / WEBL | |
| Gain YTD | 28.801 | 5.177 | 556% |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 92.8M | 7,338% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.96 | 88% |
| Turnover | 71.00 | 60.00 | 118% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.14 | 357% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| SPXL | WEBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEBL has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WEBL jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WEBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEBL | 100% | +3.57% | ||
| CVNA - WEBL | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| NET - WEBL | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| GTM - WEBL | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SNOW - WEBL | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| W - WEBL | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||