SPXL
Price
$299.36
Change
-$1.99 (-0.66%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.32B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YINN
Price
$28.16
Change
+$0.08 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
652.05M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPXL vs YINN

SPXL vs YINN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) vs. Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN)

Key Takeaways

  • SPXL seeks 300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index, providing leveraged exposure to large-cap U.S. equities, while YINN targets 300% daily performance of the FTSE China 50 Index, offering leveraged exposure to leading Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong.
  • Both ETFs are daily-reset leveraged products from Direxion that use derivatives such as swaps and futures, making them suitable primarily for short-term trading rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies due to compounding effects.
  • SPXL maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.84% compared to YINN’s 1.34%, reflecting differences in underlying market liquidity and operational complexity.
  • SPXL benefits from broad diversification across approximately 500 holdings in the S&P 500, whereas YINN concentrates on roughly 50 large-cap Chinese names, resulting in higher concentration risk.
  • Top holdings in SPXL mirror major U.S. technology and growth leaders such as Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, while YINN’s exposures center on Chinese financials and internet giants including Tencent and Alibaba.
  • Structural differences position SPXL for U.S. equity market beta and YINN for China-specific thematic and geopolitical drivers, with distinct volatility and correlation profiles in varying macroeconomic regimes.

Introduction

SPXL and YINN represent two distinct leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from the same issuer, Direxion, that appeal to investors seeking amplified daily exposure to major equity markets. They do not compete directly in the same geographic or sector space; instead, they provide alternative tactical tools—one tied to U.S. large-cap performance and the other to Chinese large-cap equities. Investors may evaluate them as complementary or contrasting options within a broader allocation framework depending on views on U.S. versus international growth, risk tolerance for leverage, and tactical positioning needs.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X Shares (SPXL) Overview

SPXL seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund is a leveraged, passive ETF that employs financial instruments including swap agreements, futures, and securities to achieve its objective. It resets leverage daily, which can lead to significant divergence from three times the index return over periods longer than one day. The ETF holds exposure equivalent to roughly 500 constituents through its leverage mechanism. Expense ratio stands at 0.84%. Top holdings generally align with S&P 500 weights, featuring technology leaders such as Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector allocations emphasize information technology, financials, and consumer discretionary, consistent with the underlying index composition. The structure is open-ended and non-diversified, with daily rebalancing inherent to the leveraged mandate.

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) Overview

YINN seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the FTSE China 50 Index. This leveraged passive ETF uses derivatives such as swaps to deliver the target exposure and resets daily. The underlying index comprises the 50 largest and most liquid Chinese companies trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Expense ratio is 1.34%. Holdings concentrate on a smaller number of names, with top positions typically including Tencent Holdings, China Construction Bank, Alibaba Group, and other financial and consumer internet firms. Sector exposure leans toward financials, communication services, and consumer discretionary. The fund is structured as an open-ended, non-diversified vehicle with daily rebalancing to maintain the 3x target.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

SPXL reflects broad U.S. large-cap equity dynamics driven by corporate earnings growth, monetary policy expectations, and technological innovation cycles. YINN tracks developments in China’s economy, including regulatory shifts affecting technology and financial sectors, cross-border capital flows, trade relations, and domestic stimulus measures. Both products operate in environments sensitive to global risk sentiment, interest rate differentials, and geopolitical tensions. Capital flows into U.S. equities have historically shown resilience in expansionary phases, while Chinese markets can experience heightened volatility tied to policy announcements and external trade developments. Leveraged vehicles in these segments amplify exposure to these macro and thematic factors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SPXL has exhibited strong responsiveness to U.S. equity rallies fueled by earnings momentum in technology and growth sectors, with daily leverage magnifying gains during upward trends but also accelerating losses in downturns. YINN’s positioning ties more closely to China-specific catalysts such as policy easing or export trends, often resulting in greater volatility and lower correlation to U.S. benchmarks. Over broader periods, relative performance has varied with shifts in global growth expectations, commodity prices, and currency movements. SPXL generally offers more consistent beta to the S&P 500, while YINN provides differentiated exposure that can benefit from or suffer under China-centric rotations. Investors should note the daily reset mechanism affects both funds similarly, emphasizing the importance of monitoring short-term horizons.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the S&P 500 constituents, and alignment with established U.S. large-cap momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to SPXL over YINN for investors seeking leveraged equity exposure. YINN’s higher cost and concentrated China exposure introduce additional variables related to geopolitical and regulatory factors that may elevate relative risk in certain scenarios.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SPXL vs. YINN commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPXL is a StrongBuy and YINN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXL has more net assets: 7.32B vs. YINN (652M). SPXL has a higher annual dividend yield than YINN: SPXL (37.187) vs YINN (-33.374). SPXL was incepted earlier than YINN: SPXL (18 years) vs YINN (17 years). SPXL (0.84) has a lower expense ratio than YINN (1.34). YINN has a higher turnover SPXL (71.00) vs SPXL (71.00).
SPXLYINNSPXL / YINN
Gain YTD37.187-33.374-111%
Net Assets7.32B652M1,123%
Total Expense Ratio0.841.3463%
Turnover71.00147.0048%
Yield0.531.1746%
Fund Existence18 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPXLYINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVXP26.170.34
+1.32%
WEBs Consumer Staples XLP Dfnd Vol ETF
EVN10.880.12
+1.13%
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
YSEP28.310.04
+0.14%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bfr ETF Sep
YCL17.910.02
+0.10%
ProShares Ultra Yen
STEW18.67-0.04
-0.21%
SRH Total Return Fund