Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SRCMX vs SWCAX
SRCMX vs SWCAX Comparison
Open Charts SRCMX vs SWCAX
SRCMX vs SWCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SRCMX vs. SWCAX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRCMX is a Hold and SWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRCMX has more cash in the bank: 675M vs. SWCAX (605M). SRCMX pays higher dividends than SWCAX: SRCMX (3.56) vs SWCAX (3.25). SRCMX was incepted earlier than SWCAX: SRCMX (37 years) vs SWCAX (35 years). SRCMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than SWCAX (0.41). SRCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.20 vs. SWCAX (35.00). SWCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SRCMX: SWCAX (0) vs SRCMX (1000). SRCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.67 vs. SWCAX (3.91). SWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.12 vs. SRCMX (-2.43).
| SRCMX | SWCAX | SRCMX / SWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.38 | 224% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.41 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.399 | -0.074 | -542% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 675M | 605M | 112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.56 | 3.25 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.67 | 3.91 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.69 | 10.09 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.43 | 2.12 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.11 | 11.07 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers