Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVNX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.54
Change-$0.45 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
William Blair Small Cap Value N
Price$29.22
Change-$0.40 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVNX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and WBVNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. WBVNX (1.07B). WBVNX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVNX (0.59) vs SSGSX (0.48). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVNX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVNX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.15). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVNX (35.00). SSGSX (2500) and WBVNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WBVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.18 vs. SSGSX (-3.68). WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 166.85 vs. SSGSX (20.58).
| SSGSX | WBVNX | SSGSX / WBVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.206 | -0.169 | -716% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 1.07B | 513% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.59 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.68 | -2.18 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.50 | 8.34 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.58 | 166.85 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.51 | 71.91 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement