Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVNX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
William Blair Small Cap Value N
Price$28.52
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.09M
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and WBVNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. WBVNX (878M). WBVNX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVNX (0.60) vs SSGSX (0.49). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVNX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVNX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.15). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVNX (35.00). SSGSX (2500) and WBVNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WBVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.04 vs. SSGSX (-13.94). WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 133.58 vs. SSGSX (2.50).
| SSGSX | WBVNX | SSGSX / WBVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.243 | -3.876 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.96B | 878M | 565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.60 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.94 | -10.04 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.31 | -7.35 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.50 | 133.58 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.84 | 63.16 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement