Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVNX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.10
Change-$0.65 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.58B
William Blair Small Cap Value N
Price$29.81
Change-$0.37 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVNX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and WBVNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.58B vs. WBVNX (1.1B). WBVNX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVNX (0.58) vs SSGSX (0.47). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVNX: SSGSX (26 years) vs WBVNX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.15). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVNX (35.00). SSGSX (2500) and WBVNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WBVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.01 vs. SSGSX (0.46). WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 187.98 vs. SSGSX (28.97).
| SSGSX | WBVNX | SSGSX / WBVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.843 | 1.719 | 165% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.58B | 1.1B | 506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.58 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.46 | 2.01 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.17 | 3.81 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.97 | 187.98 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.56 | 78.69 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement