Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVNX
SSGSX vs WBVNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVNX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and WBVNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.05B vs. WBVNX (723M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than WBVNX: SSGSX (0.52) vs WBVNX (0.44). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVNX: SSGSX (28 years) vs WBVNX (5 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than WBVNX (1.16). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. WBVNX (37.00). SSGSX (2500) and WBVNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WBVNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.78 vs. SSGSX (8.54). WBVNX return over 5 years is better than : 10.22 vs. SSGSX (-3.15).
| SSGSX | WBVNX | SSGSX / WBVNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.15 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.16 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.627 | 16.616 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.05B | 723M | 560% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.44 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | 17.78 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.39 | 28.92 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.15 | 10.22 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.34 | 86.25 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement