Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSMGX vs TRQZX
SSMGX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts SSMGX vs TRQZX
SSMGX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSMGX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSMGX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. SSMGX (140M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than SSMGX: TRQZX (0.72) vs SSMGX (0.00). SSMGX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: SSMGX (32 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). SSMGX (1.50) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. SSMGX (11.22). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSMGX: TRQZX (0) vs SSMGX (5000). SSMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.13 vs. TRQZX (2.23). SSMGX return over 5 years is better than : 0.88 vs. TRQZX (-14.91).
| SSMGX | TRQZX | SSMGX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.61 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.235 | 2.604 | 700% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140M | 22.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.13 | 2.23 | 1,219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.25 | 3.11 | 1,166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.88 | -14.91 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement