SSO
Price
$66.08
Change
+$0.46 (+0.70%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:51 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.93B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YINN
Price
$27.91
Change
+$0.50 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jul 24, 01:55 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
659.26M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SSO vs YINN

SSO vs YINN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 24, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) vs. Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN)

Key Takeaways

  • SSO delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the broad U.S. large-cap equity market via the S&P 500 Index, while YINN provides 3x daily leveraged exposure to the FTSE China 50 Index, resulting in materially different geographic and sector risk profiles.
  • SSO maintains a diversified portfolio structure with hundreds of underlying positions, whereas YINN relies on a concentrated basket of large-cap Chinese companies and derivatives, amplifying both opportunity and volatility.
  • SSO carries a lower expense ratio of approximately 0.89 percent compared with YINN’s 1.34 percent, affecting long-term cost efficiency for leveraged strategies.
  • Both funds are passively managed, daily-reset leveraged products designed for short-term tactical use rather than buy-and-hold investing due to compounding effects over multiple periods.
  • SSO benefits from deep U.S. market liquidity and broad sector diversification across technology, financials, and healthcare; YINN concentrates exposure in Chinese financials, consumer cyclicals, and communication services.
  • Structural differences in leverage multiplier, underlying index composition, and geographic focus make the two ETFs complementary tools for distinct market views rather than direct substitutes.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) represent two distinct leveraged equity strategies that appeal to investors seeking amplified exposure within major global equity markets. SSO targets the broad U.S. large-cap universe, while YINN focuses on leading Chinese companies. These ETFs do not compete directly in the same benchmark but offer alternative leveraged approaches for investors with differing geographic and thematic outlooks. The comparison highlights structural distinctions that influence suitability across varying market regimes and risk tolerances.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund employs a passive, leveraged structure using swaps, futures, and other derivatives to achieve its target exposure. It holds approximately 500 positions when fully invested, mirroring the broad market-cap-weighted composition of the S&P 500. Top holdings typically include large technology, financial, and consumer names such as those comprising the index leaders. Sector allocations reflect the S&P 500 breakdown, with significant weights in information technology, financials, and healthcare. The expense ratio stands at approximately 0.89 percent. The strategy is fully passive with daily rebalancing to maintain the 2x leverage target. High trading volume supports strong liquidity for institutional and retail participants.

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) Overview

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the FTSE China 50 Index. The fund uses a passive, leveraged approach primarily through total return swaps and other derivatives referencing the index or underlying exchange-traded products. Effective holdings are concentrated, with the majority of assets linked to a small number of large-cap Chinese companies and related instruments. Top exposures include major names in financial services, consumer cyclicals, and communication services. The expense ratio is 1.34 percent. Daily rebalancing maintains the 3x leverage target. Liquidity is adequate for the product category but generally lower than broad U.S. equity leveraged ETFs.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market, represented by the S&P 500, continues to benefit from robust corporate earnings growth, technological innovation, and resilient domestic demand. In contrast, the Chinese equity market faces ongoing challenges related to regulatory developments, property sector adjustments, geopolitical tensions, and shifting global supply chains. Capital flows into U.S. large-cap equities have remained steady, while Chinese large-cap names have experienced episodic interest tied to policy stimulus expectations and macroeconomic data releases. Both markets remain sensitive to interest rate trajectories, currency movements, and broader risk sentiment. These divergent macro drivers create distinct environments for leveraged exposure strategies focused on each region.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SSO has demonstrated amplified participation in broad U.S. equity advances driven by technology sector strength and earnings momentum among large-cap constituents. Its 2x structure magnifies daily moves while the diversified index base provides relative stability compared with single-country leveraged products. YINN has exhibited higher volatility consistent with its 3x leverage and concentrated exposure to Chinese equities, which have been influenced by policy announcements, export trends, and global risk appetite shifts. Over broader periods, relative positioning favors SSO for investors seeking leveraged U.S. market beta and YINN for those with targeted views on Chinese large-cap recovery or growth themes. Both products require active monitoring due to daily reset mechanics and compounding effects.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Professional investors seeking data-driven insights into leveraged and thematic ETFs may find the platform a useful addition to their research workflow.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and alignment with broader U.S. equity market momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) over Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) for most tactical leveraged strategies. The lower expense ratio, greater liquidity, and diversified exposure to a resilient domestic index provide a more consistent framework within current market dynamics, though individual investor objectives and risk parameters remain paramount.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SSO vs. YINN commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSO is a Hold and YINN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 7.93B vs. YINN (659M). SSO has a higher annual dividend yield than YINN: SSO (13.746) vs YINN (-34.987). SSO was incepted earlier than YINN: SSO (20 years) vs YINN (17 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than YINN (1.34). YINN has a higher turnover SSO (4.00) vs SSO (4.00).
SSOYINNSSO / YINN
Gain YTD13.746-34.987-39%
Net Assets7.93B659M1,203%
Total Expense Ratio0.871.3465%
Turnover4.00147.003%
Yield0.671.7738%
Fund Existence20 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSOYINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XBCI31.91N/A
N/A
NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF
DIVP27.39-0.04
-0.14%
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
EBUF31.20-0.05
-0.17%
Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buf ETF-Qt
FLMI24.58-0.18
-0.73%
Franklin Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
BLCV41.46-0.49
-1.17%
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
-2.47%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.57%
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%