SSO
Price
$64.42
Change
-$0.63 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
7.66B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YINN
Price
$21.45
Change
-$0.27 (-1.24%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
504.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SSO vs YINN

SSO vs YINN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) vs. Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN)

Key Takeaways

  • SSO delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the broad U.S. large-cap equity market through the S&P 500 Index, while YINN provides 3x daily leveraged exposure to the FTSE China 50 Index of leading Hong Kong-listed Chinese companies.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leverage using derivatives, resulting in significantly higher volatility and the potential for compounding effects that differ from simple multiples of underlying index returns over periods longer than one day.
  • SSO maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.87% compared with YINN’s 1.34%, offering a relative cost advantage for investors seeking amplified U.S. market exposure.
  • SSO benefits from broad diversification across approximately 500 holdings in major U.S. sectors, whereas YINN concentrates risk in a smaller set of Chinese large-cap names with heavy exposure to financials, technology, and consumer sectors.
  • Structural differences in geographic focus, leverage magnitude, and underlying market liquidity create distinct risk profiles, with YINN carrying elevated geopolitical, regulatory, and currency considerations relative to SSO.
  • Both funds are designed for short-term tactical use rather than long-term holding due to daily rebalancing requirements and the effects of volatility on leveraged returns.

Introduction

SSO and YINN represent two distinct leveraged strategies that appeal to investors seeking amplified equity exposure but target entirely different markets. SSO amplifies returns from the broad U.S. equity market, while YINN targets the performance of leading Chinese companies. They do not compete directly for the same investor base; instead, they serve as alternative tools for expressing directional views on U.S. versus Chinese equity performance. The comparison highlights structural differences in leverage, cost, diversification, and risk that matter for portfolio positioning in varying macroeconomic environments.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund is a leveraged exchange-traded fund that uses swaps, futures, and other derivatives to achieve its target exposure. It holds approximately 510 positions in practice through its derivative overlays, providing broad exposure to large- and mid-cap U.S. companies across major sectors including technology, financials, healthcare, consumer discretionary, and industrials. The net expense ratio stands at 0.87%. SSO is passively managed with daily rebalancing to maintain the 2x leverage target. Key distinguishing features include high liquidity on U.S. exchanges and suitability for short-term tactical allocation to U.S. large-cap equities.

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) Overview

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the FTSE China 50 Index. The fund is a leveraged exchange-traded fund that primarily utilizes swap agreements and other derivatives to deliver the targeted exposure. The underlying index comprises the 50 largest and most liquid Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with significant weightings in financial services, consumer discretionary, communication services, and technology. The fund itself maintains a small number of direct holdings, often centered on related exchange-traded products and cash equivalents. The expense ratio is 1.34%. YINN is passively managed with daily rebalancing to sustain the 3x leverage. Distinguishing characteristics include concentrated emerging-market exposure and elevated sensitivity to China-specific macroeconomic and policy developments.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. equity market, represented by the S&P 500, continues to benefit from domestic economic resilience, corporate earnings growth in technology and financial sectors, and investor preference for large-cap quality names. In contrast, Chinese equities face ongoing influences from regulatory adjustments, property-sector dynamics, geopolitical tensions, and shifts in global supply chains. Capital flows into U.S. large-cap equities have remained relatively steady, while Chinese markets experience periodic volatility tied to policy signals and external trade relations. Both environments feature interest-rate sensitivity and sector rotation patterns that can amplify or dampen leveraged returns differently across the two regions.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SSO has tracked amplified movements in the broad U.S. equity market, benefiting from consistent sector leadership in technology and financials while exhibiting volatility consistent with 2x daily leverage. YINN has shown greater sensitivity to China-specific catalysts, including earnings reports from major internet and banking names and shifts in regulatory sentiment, resulting in more pronounced swings. Relative positioning favors SSO for investors seeking leveraged participation in a diversified developed-market index, whereas YINN offers higher-magnitude exposure to an emerging-market theme with distinct macroeconomic drivers. Volatility differences arise primarily from leverage levels and the underlying market’s liquidity and policy environment rather than isolated price events.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs such as SSO or YINN can leverage this platform for efficient idea generation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to SSO. The lower expense ratio, broader diversification across U.S. large-cap holdings, and alignment with a more liquid and transparent developed-market index contribute to a comparatively favorable risk-adjusted profile for short-term leveraged exposure relative to YINN’s higher cost and concentrated China-specific risks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SSO vs. YINN commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSO is a Hold and YINN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 7.66B vs. YINN (505M). SSO has a higher annual dividend yield than YINN: SSO (11.683) vs YINN (-49.123). SSO was incepted earlier than YINN: SSO (20 years) vs YINN (17 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than YINN (1.34). YINN has a higher turnover SSO (4.00) vs SSO (4.00).
SSOYINNSSO / YINN
Gain YTD11.683-49.123-24%
Net Assets7.66B505M1,516%
Total Expense Ratio0.871.3465%
Turnover4.00147.003%
Yield0.611.4542%
Fund Existence20 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSOYINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHD11.750.05
+0.43%
Blackrock Muniholdings Fund
CBLS33.450.10
+0.30%
Clough Hedged Equity ETF
IBTQ25.200.06
+0.24%
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Trsy ETF
JANW38.31-0.13
-0.34%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Jan ETF
QQQP218.80-3.19
-1.44%
Tradr 2X Long Innovation100 QuarterlyETF

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
-0.97%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
+5.71%
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.14%
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%