SSO
Price
$72.22
Change
-$0.31 (-0.43%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
8.58B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YINN
Price
$28.16
Change
+$0.08 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
652.05M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SSO vs YINN

SSO vs YINN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) vs. Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN)

Key Takeaways

  • SSO provides 2x daily leveraged exposure to the S&P 500 Index through derivatives, while YINN delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the FTSE China 50 Index, creating fundamentally different risk and return profiles.
  • SSO targets broad U.S. large-cap equities with approximately 500 underlying components, whereas YINN concentrates on the 50 largest Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong, resulting in narrower geographic and sector exposure.
  • Expense ratios differ meaningfully, with SSO at a net 0.87% compared to YINN’s 1.34%, reflecting the higher complexity and costs associated with China-focused leverage.
  • Both ETFs employ swap agreements and other derivatives for leverage rather than holding underlying securities directly, amplifying daily movements and introducing compounding effects over longer periods.
  • SSO benefits from high liquidity in U.S. markets and broad diversification across technology, financials, and healthcare sectors, while YINN offers concentrated exposure to Chinese financials, consumer, and technology names amid evolving regulatory and macroeconomic conditions.
  • Structural differences position SSO as a tactical tool for short-term U.S. equity momentum and YINN for investors seeking amplified exposure to China-specific themes and volatility.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) represent distinct leveraged strategies that appeal to investors seeking magnified daily returns but operate in entirely different markets. SSO amplifies U.S. large-cap performance, while YINN targets Chinese equities, making them alternatives rather than direct competitors. The comparison highlights how investors might choose between domestic equity leverage and international emerging-market exposure within a similar leveraged-ETF framework, particularly as global capital flows respond to interest-rate cycles, trade dynamics, and sector rotations.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) that uses total-return swaps, futures contracts, and other derivatives to achieve its objective rather than holding the underlying stocks directly. It maintains exposure to approximately 500 large- and mid-cap U.S. companies through these instruments, with top underlying index weights typically including technology leaders such as NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corporation. Sector allocations mirror the S&P 500, featuring heavy weightings in information technology, financials, and healthcare. The net expense ratio stands at 0.87%. As a passive, rules-based leveraged product, SSO resets exposure daily, which suits short-term tactical use but can lead to volatility decay over extended holding periods. The structure emphasizes liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads on major U.S. exchanges.

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) Overview

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares (YINN) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% (3x) the daily performance of the FTSE China 50 Index. This leveraged ETF employs swap agreements, primarily with the iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI), along with cash equivalents to deliver amplified exposure to the 50 largest and most liquid Chinese companies traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Top index constituents often include Tencent Holdings, Alibaba Group, and major banks such as China Construction Bank and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. Sector exposure concentrates in financials, consumer discretionary, and communication services. The gross and net expense ratio is 1.34%. YINN is a non-diversified, passive leveraged product that resets daily, introducing significant compounding effects and heightened sensitivity to China-specific events. The fund structure prioritizes derivative efficiency for short-term trading in a market characterized by geopolitical and regulatory influences.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The comparison occurs against a backdrop of divergent equity-market drivers. U.S. large-cap equities, the focus of SSO, benefit from robust corporate earnings in technology and artificial intelligence, supported by domestic economic resilience and capital expenditure cycles. In contrast, YINN’s China exposure faces headwinds and opportunities from evolving regulatory policies, property-sector stabilization efforts, and shifts in global trade relations. Macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations, currency movements, and foreign investment flows influence both markets, though China-specific catalysts include stimulus measures and export dynamics. Sector risks differ sharply: U.S. technology concentration introduces valuation sensitivity, while Chinese holdings carry geopolitical and policy uncertainty. Capital flows into leveraged products remain selective, favoring vehicles aligned with prevailing risk sentiment.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SSO has exhibited amplified participation in broad U.S. equity advances driven by technology earnings strength and sector rotation toward growth stocks, while experiencing sharper drawdowns during volatility spikes. YINN’s performance has reflected China’s macroeconomic shifts, including policy announcements and commodity trends, resulting in elevated volatility relative to unleveraged benchmarks. Relative positioning shows SSO benefiting from deeper U.S. market liquidity and more consistent trend participation, whereas YINN offers higher beta to China-specific developments but carries greater dispersion risk. Over multi-week periods, both funds demonstrate the effects of daily reset mechanics, with performance diverging based on the direction and magnitude of underlying index moves rather than long-term compounding alone.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The fund’s lower expense ratio, broader diversification across established U.S. large-cap holdings, and alignment with resilient domestic earnings momentum provide a comparatively stronger profile for leveraged exposure in the prevailing environment. YINN’s higher costs and concentrated China exposure introduce elevated risk factors that temper its relative standing under current conditions, though both remain tools best suited for short-term tactical applications.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SSO vs. YINN commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSO is a StrongBuy and YINN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 8.58B vs. YINN (652M). SSO has a higher annual dividend yield than YINN: SSO (25.726) vs YINN (-33.374). SSO was incepted earlier than YINN: SSO (20 years) vs YINN (17 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than YINN (1.34). YINN has a higher turnover SSO (4.00) vs SSO (4.00).
SSOYINNSSO / YINN
Gain YTD25.726-33.374-77%
Net Assets8.58B652M1,316%
Total Expense Ratio0.871.3465%
Turnover4.00147.003%
Yield0.671.1758%
Fund Existence20 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSOYINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YINN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBW34.810.17
+0.49%
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
FTLS76.300.20
+0.26%
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
EAOR38.03N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Aware 60/40 Bal Allc ETF
MVFD31.25-0.04
-0.12%
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF
EFU6.69-0.02
-0.37%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
+1.37%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%