STCE
Price
$77.26
Change
-$1.70 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
305.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WGMI
Price
$70.98
Change
-$1.00 (-1.39%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
394.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

STCE vs WGMI

STCE vs WGMI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) vs. CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI)

Key Takeaways

  • STCE offers broader exposure to companies benefiting from cryptocurrencies, blockchain, and distributed ledger technology through a passive index strategy, while WGMI provides targeted, actively managed exposure specifically to Bitcoin mining operations.
  • STCE maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.30% compared to WGMI’s 0.75%, potentially improving long-term cost efficiency for investors seeking thematic crypto exposure.
  • STCE holds approximately 42 securities with diversified allocations across technology services and financials, whereas WGMI concentrates on roughly 27-28 Bitcoin mining firms, resulting in higher concentration risk.
  • Both ETFs operate within the digital assets sector, but STCE’s index-based approach emphasizes global companies involved in crypto development and utilization, while WGMI focuses on mining infrastructure and operations.
  • Structural differences in management style—passive versus active—and sector allocations position STCE as a more diversified thematic vehicle and WGMI as a specialized mining play with potentially higher volatility tied to Bitcoin production cycles.
  • Liquidity and rebalancing methodologies reflect their respective strategies, with STCE benefiting from broader market participation in crypto-related equities.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the digital assets ecosystem often evaluate specialized exchange-traded funds that capture different segments of the cryptocurrency and blockchain value chain. The Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) and the CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) both target this space but employ distinct approaches. STCE provides passive, index-tracked access to a wider array of companies positioned to benefit from crypto and blockchain advancements, while WGMI delivers active management focused exclusively on Bitcoin miners. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles within the same thematic sector, allowing investors to select based on desired breadth versus specialization.

Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) Overview

The Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Schwab Crypto Thematic Index (Net), which targets global companies involved in the development, utilization, or business activities connected to cryptocurrencies, digital assets, blockchain, and distributed ledger technology. The ETF holds approximately 42 securities, with top holdings typically including major players such as Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN), MicroStrategy Inc. (MSTR), Marathon Digital Holdings Inc. (MARA), and Riot Platforms Inc. (RIOT). Sector allocations emphasize technology services at around 57% and financials at approximately 23%, alongside smaller weights in miscellaneous and commercial services. STCE features an expense ratio of 0.30% and employs standard index rebalancing. As a non-diversified fund, it offers thematic exposure with moderate concentration in leading holdings.

CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) Overview

The CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) is an actively managed fund that seeks to provide targeted exposure to the Bitcoin mining industry. The ETF typically holds 27 to 28 securities, with significant allocations to mining operators such as Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR), IREN Limited (IREN), and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Sector breakdowns concentrate heavily in financial services at roughly 51% and technology at approximately 45%, reflecting the operational characteristics of mining firms. WGMI carries an expense ratio of 0.75% and uses active management without a fixed index benchmark. This structure allows for dynamic adjustments to mining-specific opportunities and risks within the digital assets sector.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The digital assets and blockchain sector continues to evolve amid macroeconomic influences including interest rate expectations, regulatory developments, and capital flows into cryptocurrency infrastructure. Bitcoin mining operations face variables such as energy costs, network difficulty adjustments, and hardware efficiency trends, while broader crypto-themed companies respond to adoption rates and institutional participation. Both ETFs operate in an environment shaped by evolving regulatory clarity around digital assets and potential shifts in risk appetite tied to broader equity market cycles. Capital allocation within the sector often rotates between mining specialists and diversified technology or financial firms involved in crypto services.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the broader thematic exposure of STCE has aligned with movements in major crypto-related equities and blockchain adopters, benefiting from diversification across multiple sub-themes. WGMI’s concentrated focus on Bitcoin miners has produced performance patterns more closely tied to Bitcoin price dynamics, mining margins, and operational execution during periods of sector rotation. Relative positioning highlights STCE’s lower cost structure and wider holdings as potential stabilizers, contrasted with WGMI’s higher expense ratio and specialized mandate, which may amplify sensitivity to mining-specific catalysts such as hash rate growth or energy market shifts. Volatility differences stem from these structural distinctions rather than isolated price events.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to the Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across 42 holdings, and passive index methodology that provides consistent exposure to the expanding crypto and blockchain ecosystem. These characteristics support improved cost efficiency and reduced single-theme concentration risk relative to the more specialized and higher-cost CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI).

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
STCE vs. WGMI commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STCE is a Hold and WGMI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WGMI has more net assets: 394M vs. STCE (305M). WGMI has a higher annual dividend yield than STCE: WGMI (85.472) vs STCE (28.853). STCE was incepted earlier than WGMI: STCE (4 years) vs WGMI (4 years). STCE (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than WGMI (0.75). STCE has a higher turnover WGMI (40.00) vs WGMI (40.00).
STCEWGMISTCE / WGMI
Gain YTD28.85385.47234%
Net Assets305M394M77%
Total Expense Ratio0.300.7540%
Turnover60.0040.00150%
Yield1.460.00-
Fund Existence4 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STCEWGMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STCE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WGMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSOAX37.240.21
+0.57%
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class A
JHQRX34.83N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity R6
HMSIX13.62N/A
N/A
Hennessy Midstream Institutional
PIIJX17.91N/A
N/A
Principal Diversified Intl J
BGEFX14.08-0.41
-2.81%
Baillie Gifford International Growth 4

STCE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STCE has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STCE jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STCE
1D Price
Change %
STCE100%
-2.15%
CLSK - STCE
86%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
RIOT - STCE
84%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
CIFR - STCE
84%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
HUT - STCE
84%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
MARA - STCE
80%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
More

WGMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WGMI has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WGMI jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WGMI
1D Price
Change %
WGMI100%
-1.39%
CIFR - WGMI
91%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
IREN - WGMI
87%
Closely correlated
-3.73%
HUT - WGMI
86%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
RIOT - WGMI
84%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
CLSK - WGMI
83%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
More