STJPF
Price
$16.60
Change
-$1.40 (-7.78%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
8.83B
TETAA
Price
$14.50
Change
-$1.00 (-6.45%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
27.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

STJPF vs TETAA

Header iconSTJPF vs TETAA Comparison
Open Charts STJPF vs TETAABanner chart's image
St. James Place Capital
Price$16.60
Change-$1.40 (-7.78%)
Volume$125
Capitalization8.83B
Teton Advisors
Price$14.50
Change-$1.00 (-6.45%)
Volume$321
Capitalization27.6M
STJPF vs TETAA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TETAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STJPF vs. TETAA commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STJPF is a Hold and TETAA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (STJPF: $16.60 vs. TETAA: $14.50)
Brand notoriety: STJPF and TETAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STJPF: 9% vs. TETAA: 29%
Market capitalization -- STJPF: $8.83B vs. TETAA: $27.6M
STJPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $8.83B. TETAA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $27.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STJPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTETAA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • STJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TETAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STJPF is a better buy in the long-term than TETAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STJPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TETAA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STJPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TETAA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STJPF is a better buy in the short-term than TETAA.

Price Growth

STJPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TETAA (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.99% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STJPF($8.83B) has a higher market cap than TETAA($27.6M). TETAA has higher P/E ratio than STJPF: TETAA (19.08) vs STJPF (13.02). STJPF YTD gains are higher at: 88.851 vs. TETAA (7.567). STJPF has more cash in the bank: 6.4B vs. TETAA (30.5M). TETAA has less debt than STJPF: TETAA (67.8K) vs STJPF (402M). STJPF has higher revenues than TETAA: STJPF (16.9B) vs TETAA (9.75M).
STJPFTETAASTJPF / TETAA
Capitalization8.83B27.6M31,996%
EBITDAN/A416K-
Gain YTD88.8517.5671,174%
P/E Ratio13.0219.0868%
Revenue16.9B9.75M173,333%
Total Cash6.4B30.5M20,997%
Total Debt402M67.8K592,920%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STJPF vs TETAA: Fundamental Ratings
STJPF
TETAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9994
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
2193
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6557
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STJPF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TETAA (99). This means that STJPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as TETAA (100). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TETAA (93). This means that STJPF’s stock grew significantly faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as TETAA (55). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

TETAA's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as STJPF (65). This means that TETAA’s stock grew similarly to STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STJPFTETAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STJPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TETAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GPAEF24.90N/A
N/A
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico S.A.B. de CV
MNGPF2.41N/A
N/A
Man Group Plc
HNWEF0.07N/A
N/A
PEAK DISCOVERY CAP LTD.
BRSYF5.49N/A
N/A
Brainsway Ltd.
PFBN8.65N/A
N/A
Pacific Alliance Bank (CA)

STJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STJPF and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STJPF and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJPF
1D Price
Change %
STJPF100%
N/A
HRZN - STJPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLFPF - STJPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-9.04%
SLFPY - STJPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.34%
TETAA - STJPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.45%
More

TETAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TETAA and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TETAA and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TETAA
1D Price
Change %
TETAA100%
-6.45%
SRXXF - TETAA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTRS - TETAA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
STT - TETAA
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
STJPF - TETAA
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - TETAA
3%
Poorly correlated
-9.04%
More