SUNC
Price
$71.07
Change
+$1.60 (+2.30%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.66B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TMDE
Price
$0.96
Change
+$0.15 (+18.52%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
22.55M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUNC vs TMDE

SUNC vs TMDE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUNC vs. TMDE commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUNC is a StrongBuy and TMDE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (SUNC: $71.07 vs. TMDE: $0.96)
Brand notoriety: SUNC and TMDE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUNC: 69% vs. TMDE: 55%
Market capitalization -- SUNC: $3.66B vs. TMDE: $22.55M
SUNC [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $3.66B. TMDE’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $22.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $119.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMDE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMDE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUNC is a better buy in the long-term than TMDE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SUNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMDE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TMDE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SUNC is a better buy in the short-term than TMDE.

Price Growth

SUNC (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +4.73% price change this week, while TMDE (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +19.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +18.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

SUNC is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+18.55% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUNC($3.66B) has a higher market cap than TMDE($22.6M). TMDE has higher P/E ratio than SUNC: TMDE (11.78) vs SUNC (7.44). TMDE YTD gains are higher at: 125.176 vs. SUNC (48.953). SUNC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.81B vs. TMDE (7.01M). TMDE has less debt than SUNC: TMDE (92.8M) vs SUNC (15.4B). SUNC has higher revenues than TMDE: SUNC (25.2B) vs TMDE (607M).
SUNCTMDESUNC / TMDE
Capitalization3.66B22.6M16,199%
EBITDA1.81B7.01M25,870%
Gain YTD48.953125.17639%
P/E Ratio7.4411.7863%
Revenue25.2B607M4,152%
Total Cash718MN/A-
Total Debt15.4B92.8M16,595%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUNC: Fundamental Ratings
SUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUNCTMDE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMDE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOCL46.36N/A
N/A
Global X Social Media ETF
AUGP33.19-0.01
-0.05%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Aug
IBD23.66-0.06
-0.25%
Inspire Corporate Bond ETF
MAGY42.84-0.37
-0.86%
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
UPRO142.73-3.43
-2.35%
ProShares UltraPro S&P500

SUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUNC and DTM have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUNC and DTM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUNC
1D Price
Change %
SUNC100%
+2.30%
DTM - SUNC
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
SOBO - SUNC
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
TMDE - SUNC
3%
Poorly correlated
+18.06%
KNTK - SUNC
-23%
Poorly correlated
+4.57%

TMDE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMDE has been loosely correlated with MARPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMDE jumps, then MARPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMDE
1D Price
Change %
TMDE100%
+18.06%
MARPS - TMDE
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.71%
BANL - TMDE
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
VG - TMDE
29%
Poorly correlated
+9.15%
LNG - TMDE
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
OKE - TMDE
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
More