TBF
Price
$25.59
Change
+$0.14 (+0.55%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Net Assets
121.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TMV
Price
$43.51
Change
+$0.68 (+1.59%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Net Assets
206.06M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TBF vs TMV

TBF vs TMV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 20, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) vs. Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3X ETF (TMV)

Key Takeaways

  • TBF provides -1x daily inverse exposure to the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while TMV delivers -3x daily inverse exposure to the same benchmark, creating materially different risk and return profiles.
  • Both ETFs pursue a similar objective of profiting from declines in long-term U.S. Treasury prices but differ significantly in leverage, with TMV amplifying daily moves three times more than TBF.
  • Expense ratios are comparable, with TBF at 0.95% and TMV at 0.97%, reflecting the costs of maintaining derivative-based inverse strategies.
  • Both funds rely on swaps and futures contracts rather than traditional bond holdings, resulting in minimal conventional securities and heavy use of cash collateral and short-term instruments.
  • Daily reset mechanisms introduce compounding effects that are more pronounced in the higher-leverage TMV, making it suitable primarily for short-term tactical use rather than extended holding periods.
  • Structural positioning favors TBF for investors seeking moderated inverse exposure within the long-duration Treasury sector, while TMV suits those comfortable with amplified volatility for targeted hedging or directional bets.

Introduction

Investors seeking to hedge against or capitalize on rising long-term interest rates often turn to inverse Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs). TBF and TMV both target the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index but employ different leverage levels, offering distinct tools within the same thematic space. They do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they provide scaled alternatives for expressing bearish views on long-duration U.S. government bonds. This comparison highlights their structural differences to help investors match exposure intensity with risk tolerance and investment horizon in the current rate-sensitive environment.

ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) Overview

TBF is a ProShares inverse ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to -1x the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The index includes publicly issued U.S. Treasury securities with remaining maturities greater than 20 years. The fund achieves exposure primarily through total return swaps and futures contracts rather than direct bond ownership, resulting in a small number of holdings focused on derivatives and cash equivalents. Its net expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a passive, daily-reset product, TBF is designed for short-term tactical positioning and carries the typical risks associated with inverse and derivative-based strategies, including potential tracking deviation over multiple days.

Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3X ETF (TMV) Overview

TMV is a Direxion leveraged inverse ETF seeking daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to -3x the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Like TBF, it relies on swaps and futures to deliver exposure, with holdings consisting mainly of derivative contracts and short-term cash management instruments. The fund carries a net expense ratio of 0.97%. Its triple-leverage structure magnifies both gains and losses on a daily basis, making it a higher-volatility instrument suited for experienced traders employing short holding periods. The daily reset and compounding effects are more impactful due to the elevated leverage factor.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the long-duration U.S. Treasury sector, where performance is closely tied to interest rate expectations, Federal Reserve policy decisions, inflation trends, and broader macroeconomic conditions. Rising yields typically pressure bond prices lower, benefiting inverse products, while falling yields or flight-to-safety flows can generate headwinds. Regulatory oversight of leveraged and inverse ETFs remains consistent, with emphasis on suitability disclosures for retail investors. Capital flows into these vehicles often increase during periods of rate volatility or when investors anticipate policy tightening, though usage remains concentrated among sophisticated market participants.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, TBF has delivered more moderate returns aligned with its single-inverse mandate, exhibiting lower daily volatility compared to its triple-leveraged counterpart. TMV has shown amplified movements that can accelerate gains during sustained rate increases but also heighten losses and decay risks in choppy or range-bound environments. Relative positioning depends on the prevailing interest rate trajectory: both benefit from rising long-term yields, yet TMV magnifies outcomes, requiring tighter risk management. Sector rotation away from duration-sensitive assets and shifts in Treasury supply dynamics influence both funds similarly, though leverage differences create distinct drawdown profiles over multi-week or multi-month periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener today.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and diversification profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to TBF. Its single-inverse leverage provides more controlled exposure to the long-term Treasury theme with reduced compounding risk relative to the triple-leveraged alternative, supporting more consistent positioning across varied market regimes while maintaining competitive expense characteristics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TBF vs. TMV commentary
Oct 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TBF is a Hold and TMV is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for TBF with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

TBF in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026

TBF moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 37 of 48 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on TBF as a result. In 61 of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for TBF turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 34 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 71%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TBF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where TBF's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 18 of 18 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 8 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +1.00% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TBF advanced for three days, in 240 of 295 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.

TBF may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 261 of 303 cases where TBF Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 86%.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for TMV with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

TMV's RSI Indicator ascends from oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for TMV moved out of oversold territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 21 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 21 of the 21 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 8 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +2.02% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TMV advanced for three days, in 271 of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

TMV may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 258 of 277 cases where TMV Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on TMV as a result. In 77 of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for TMV turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 44 of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.

TMV moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TMV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TBFTMV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
TBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMNL48.600.04
+0.08%
T. Rowe Price Long Municipal Income ETF (TMNL)
KDRN22.48N/A
N/A
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN)
UJUL41.35-0.08
-0.20%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - July (UJUL)
PJUL49.65-0.13
-0.26%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL)
FLSW43.37-0.46
-1.04%
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW)