TBF
Price
$24.39
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
104.58M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TMV
Price
$37.32
Change
-$0.44 (-1.17%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
171.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TBF vs TMV

TBF vs TMV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) vs. Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3X Shares (TMV)

Key Takeaways

  • TBF provides -1x daily inverse exposure to long-term U.S. Treasury bonds, while TMV delivers -3x leveraged inverse exposure, resulting in significantly higher volatility for the latter.
  • Both ETFs target the same underlying benchmark—the performance of U.S. Treasury securities with maturities greater than 20 years—yet differ materially in leverage, making TMV suitable only for short-term tactical use.
  • Expense ratios are comparable, with TBF at 0.95% and TMV at approximately 0.97%, reflecting the cost of derivatives-based strategies.
  • Neither ETF holds physical bonds; both rely on swaps, futures, and other derivatives, leading to daily rebalancing and potential compounding effects over longer periods.
  • Risk profiles diverge sharply: TBF offers moderate inverse exposure with lower decay risk, whereas TMV amplifies both gains and losses, increasing the potential for substantial drawdowns.
  • These funds serve as tools for hedging interest-rate risk or expressing bearish views on long-duration Treasuries rather than core portfolio holdings.

Introduction

ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3X Shares (TMV) both provide inverse exposure to long-duration U.S. Treasuries, making them relevant for investors navigating interest-rate environments. They do not compete as direct substitutes but instead represent scaled versions of the same strategy: TBF offers unleveraged inverse exposure, while TMV applies three times leverage. This distinction allows investors to select the magnitude of their bearish bet on bond prices within the fixed-income sector.

ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury (TBF) Overview

TBF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The ETF employs derivatives such as swaps and futures contracts rather than holding physical securities. It typically maintains a small number of holdings focused on these instruments. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a passive inverse product, TBF rebalances daily to maintain its target exposure. Distinguishing features include its single-inverse structure, which reduces the impact of volatility decay compared with leveraged counterparts, and its focus exclusively on long-term Treasury price movements.

Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3X Shares (TMV) Overview

TMV seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times the inverse (-3x) of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Like TBF, it achieves its objective through derivatives including total return swaps and futures, resulting in a minimal number of holdings. The expense ratio is approximately 0.97%. As a leveraged inverse ETF, TMV requires daily rebalancing to reset exposure. Key characteristics include amplified sensitivity to Treasury price declines and heightened volatility, making it appropriate for short-term tactical positioning rather than extended holding periods.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the inverse fixed-income segment, specifically targeting long-duration U.S. Treasuries. The primary macroeconomic driver remains interest-rate expectations and Federal Reserve policy. Rising yields pressure bond prices downward, benefiting inverse products, while falling yields produce the opposite effect. Sector risks include duration-driven price swings, liquidity conditions in the Treasury market, and potential changes in monetary policy. Capital flows into these vehicles often increase during periods of rate volatility or when investors seek to hedge duration exposure in broader bond portfolios. Regulatory oversight of leveraged and inverse ETFs remains consistent, with emphasis on suitability disclosures for retail investors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, TBF has delivered more moderate returns aligned with daily Treasury price movements, exhibiting lower volatility than its leveraged peer. TMV has shown amplified responses to the same underlying shifts, magnifying both gains during Treasury price declines and losses during rallies. Relative positioning favors TBF for investors seeking consistent inverse exposure without the compounding effects of leverage. TMV suits short-term tactical trades around interest-rate announcements or yield-curve shifts. Over multi-week or multi-month horizons, the performance gap widens due to daily reset mechanics, underscoring the importance of holding-period alignment with each fund’s design.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, TBF presents a more balanced risk profile for sustained inverse exposure due to its unleveraged design, lower potential for volatility decay, and alignment with moderate tactical hedging needs. TMV offers greater upside in strongly trending bear markets for Treasuries but carries elevated risk of amplified losses. Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of suitability to TBF for most investors seeking durable positioning within this strategy category.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TBF vs. TMV commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TBF is a Hold and TMV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMV has more net assets: 172M vs. TBF (105M). TMV has a higher annual dividend yield than TBF: TMV (2.627) vs TBF (1.505). TBF was incepted earlier than TMV: TBF (17 years) vs TMV (17 years). TBF (0.95) and TMV (0.97) have comparable expense ratios .
TBFTMVTBF / TMV
Gain YTD1.5052.62757%
Net Assets105M172M61%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.9798%
TurnoverN/A0.00-
Yield2.852.61109%
Fund Existence17 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TBFTMV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPAYX12.560.07
+0.56%
Integrity Dividend Summit I
QCERX23.35N/A
N/A
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style R6
SGLYX10.70N/A
N/A
SEI Global Managed Volatility Y (SIMT)
JGAVX100.28N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Value R3
APSDX18.22-0.20
-1.09%
NYLI Fiera SMID Growth Class R6