TLT
Price
$82.25
Change
-$0.63 (-0.76%)
Updated
Aug 31, 12:31 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
47.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UTHY
Price
$38.93
Change
-$0.13 (-0.33%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
193.71M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TLT vs UTHY

TLT vs UTHY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) vs. F/m US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY)

Key Takeaways

  • TLT provides diversified exposure to a basket of U.S. Treasury bonds with maturities exceeding 20 years, while UTHY concentrates on a single on-the-run 30-year Treasury bond.
  • Both ETFs maintain an identical expense ratio of 0.15% and follow passive indexing strategies focused on long-duration government debt.
  • TLT holds approximately 46 securities for broader diversification within the long end of the Treasury curve, whereas UTHY typically maintains just two holdings including the target bond and minimal cash.
  • TLT offers significantly higher liquidity and assets under management, making it suitable for larger institutional or frequent trading needs compared to the smaller, more targeted UTHY.
  • Exposure profiles differ in duration targeting: TLT spans a range of bonds over 20 years, while UTHY delivers precise exposure to the most liquid current 30-year issue with quarterly rebalancing.
  • Both serve investors seeking long-duration Treasury exposure for interest rate sensitivity or portfolio ballast, but TLT emphasizes scale and breadth while UTHY prioritizes specificity in the 30-year segment.

Introduction

Investors seeking long-duration U.S. Treasury exposure often compare options that balance diversification, liquidity, and precise maturity targeting. TLT and UTHY both track segments of the Treasury yield curve but employ distinct approaches within the fixed-income space. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer alternative strategies for similar goals such as hedging equity risk, managing duration, or positioning for shifts in long-term interest rates. This comparison highlights structural differences that influence suitability across varying portfolio needs.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) Overview

TLT seeks to track the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, providing passive exposure to U.S. Treasury bonds with remaining maturities greater than 20 years. The fund holds approximately 46 securities, with top holdings consisting of various long-term Treasury bonds such as those maturing in 2053 through 2056. Allocations are concentrated in Treasuries at nearly 99%, with negligible cash or derivatives. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As a passively managed ETF, it rebalances periodically to maintain index alignment, emphasizing broad representation across the long end of the yield curve. Distinguishing features include substantial assets under management and high trading volume on NASDAQ, supporting efficient execution.

F/m US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF (UTHY) Overview

UTHY aims to track the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 30Y Total Return USD Unhedged Index through a passive, single-bond strategy focused on the most recently issued on-the-run 30-year U.S. Treasury bond. The fund typically holds two positions: the target Treasury bond and a small cash allocation. The expense ratio is 0.15%. Launched in 2023, it features quarterly rebalancing tied to new Treasury auctions. Allocations center on government bonds with high concentration in the single issue. Distinguishing features include targeted duration exposure to the current 30-year benchmark and monthly dividend distributions, designed for investors preferring precise maturity focus over basket diversification.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The long-duration U.S. Treasury segment operates within a broader fixed-income environment shaped by Federal Reserve monetary policy, inflation expectations, and fiscal dynamics. Capital flows into government bonds often increase during periods of economic uncertainty or anticipated rate cuts, while regulatory developments around Treasury issuance and market structure influence liquidity. Macroeconomic drivers such as growth forecasts and geopolitical events can affect yield volatility across the curve. Sector risks include interest rate sensitivity, where extended durations amplify price movements in response to policy shifts, alongside potential supply pressures from ongoing Treasury auctions.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to long-term interest rate movements, with performance tied to Treasury yield fluctuations and sector rotation within fixed income. TLT's diversified holdings across multiple maturities have contributed to relatively stable tracking of the broader 20+ year segment, while UTHY's concentration on the on-the-run 30-year bond has aligned it closely with specific auction-driven dynamics. Relative positioning highlights TLT's advantages in liquidity during high-volume periods, whereas UTHY offers more pointed exposure useful for fine-tuning duration in portfolios. Volatility differences stem from TLT's broader basket versus UTHY's single-security focus, influencing behavior amid earnings cycles or macro shifts affecting rates.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and liquidity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to TLT. Its broader holdings and established scale provide consistent trend alignment and lower concentration risk within the long-duration Treasury space compared to UTHY’s more concentrated approach.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TLT vs. UTHY commentary
Sep 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TLT is a Hold and UTHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLT has more net assets: 47B vs. UTHY (194M). TLT has a higher annual dividend yield than UTHY: TLT (-2.367) vs UTHY (-2.631). TLT was incepted earlier than UTHY: TLT (24 years) vs UTHY (3 years). TLT (0.15) and UTHY (0.15) have comparable expense ratios . UTHY has a higher turnover TLT (18.00) vs TLT (18.00).
TLTUTHYTLT / UTHY
Gain YTD-2.367-2.63190%
Net Assets47B194M24,227%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.15100%
Turnover18.00390.005%
Yield4.755.2690%
Fund Existence24 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLTUTHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UTHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMCO9.840.01
+0.10%
Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund
NNY8.17N/A
N/A
Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund
MYHC25.11-0.02
-0.10%
State Street®My2029 HighYield CrptBdETF
CGDG38.67-0.10
-0.26%
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
QQQG30.89-0.58
-1.85%
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Csh CwsGrLdrsETF