TLT
Price
$82.05
Change
-$0.29 (-0.35%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
46.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZROZ
Price
$57.97
Change
-$0.39 (-0.67%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TLT vs ZROZ

TLT vs ZROZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) vs. PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index Exchange-Traded Fund (ZROZ)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs provide targeted exposure to long-duration U.S. Treasury securities and share an identical expense ratio of 0.15%, making cost differences negligible for most investors.
  • TLT tracks an index of coupon-paying U.S. Treasury bonds with maturities exceeding 20 years and holds 46 securities, offering broader diversification within the long-government segment.
  • ZROZ tracks an index of zero-coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS with maturities of 25 years or longer, resulting in only 21-22 holdings and greater price sensitivity to interest-rate changes due to the absence of periodic coupon payments.
  • The structural difference in bond type—coupon bonds versus principal-only STRIPS—creates distinct duration profiles, with ZROZ exhibiting higher volatility and convexity in response to shifts in the yield curve.
  • Both funds are passively managed and fully invested in U.S. government debt, positioning them as tools for interest-rate hedging or duration extension rather than credit or equity exposure.
  • In the current environment of evolving monetary policy expectations, TLT’s larger, more liquid portfolio may appeal to investors prioritizing stability in holdings composition, while ZROZ suits those seeking amplified duration exposure.

Introduction

Long-duration U.S. Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs) serve distinct roles in fixed-income portfolios, particularly for investors managing interest-rate risk or seeking duration extension. The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and the PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index Exchange-Traded Fund (ZROZ) both focus on the longest segment of the Treasury curve but employ different methodologies. They do not compete directly for the same mandate; instead, they offer complementary or alternative exposures within the long-government sector. This comparison highlights structural distinctions that influence risk, liquidity, and responsiveness to macroeconomic shifts such as Federal Reserve policy changes and inflation trends.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) Overview

The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) seeks to track the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It holds 46 securities, all U.S. Treasury bonds with remaining maturities greater than 20 years. Top holdings consist of individual Treasury issues such as the 4.75% and 4.625% bonds due in the 2050s, with the top 10 representing approximately 40% of assets. Sector allocation is nearly 99% U.S. government bonds. The fund maintains a passive, market-cap-weighted approach with quarterly rebalancing aligned to the index. Its expense ratio stands at 0.15%. TLT provides straightforward exposure to coupon-paying long Treasuries without leverage or derivatives overlays.

PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index Exchange-Traded Fund (ZROZ) Overview

The PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index Exchange-Traded Fund (ZROZ) seeks to track the ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. It holds 21-22 zero-coupon Treasury STRIPS with maturities of 25 years or longer. All assets are concentrated in U.S. government principal-only securities, creating a pure duration play without coupon income. The fund follows a passive, market-cap-weighted replication strategy with periodic rebalancing to the index. Its expense ratio is 0.15%. ZROZ delivers amplified sensitivity to interest-rate movements due to the zero-coupon structure and longer effective duration relative to coupon-bearing alternatives.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the long-duration U.S. Treasury segment, which remains sensitive to Federal Reserve monetary policy, inflation expectations, and fiscal developments. Recent market cycles have featured ongoing adjustments in rate-cut probabilities and yield-curve dynamics. Capital flows into long-government products often accelerate during periods of anticipated easing or heightened uncertainty. Regulatory and macroeconomic drivers, including Treasury issuance patterns and central-bank balance-sheet management, continue to influence supply and demand for these securities. Sector risks center on duration exposure, where even modest yield increases can produce meaningful price declines, while falling yields amplify gains. These characteristics position the funds as tactical tools rather than core equity or credit holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent weeks and months, both ETFs have responded to shifts in interest-rate expectations and broader macroeconomic signals. ZROZ has demonstrated greater price volatility owing to its zero-coupon composition and extended duration, leading to more pronounced moves during yield-curve steepening or flattening episodes. In contrast, TLT has exhibited relatively moderated fluctuations due to its larger number of holdings and inclusion of coupon-paying bonds. Relative positioning favors TLT for investors seeking steadier long-duration exposure, while ZROZ aligns with strategies emphasizing maximum convexity and sensitivity to rate declines. Sector rotation and macro shifts continue to drive performance differentials between the two approaches.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking to compare or monitor funds like TLT and ZROZ may find the platform useful for generating additional ideas aligned with their criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, and diversification profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest edge to the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Its larger holdings count and inclusion of coupon bonds provide a more balanced risk exposure within the long-Treasury category, supporting greater consistency across market cycles. While the PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index Exchange-Traded Fund (ZROZ) offers compelling duration amplification, the AI favors TLT for its broader representation of the sector and potentially smoother performance trajectory in varied interest-rate environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TLT vs. ZROZ commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TLT is a Hold and ZROZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLT has more net assets: 46.2B vs. ZROZ (1.6B). TLT has a higher annual dividend yield than ZROZ: TLT (-3.344) vs ZROZ (-7.434). TLT was incepted earlier than ZROZ: TLT (24 years) vs ZROZ (17 years). TLT (0.15) and ZROZ (0.15) have comparable expense ratios . TLT has a higher turnover ZROZ (17.00) vs ZROZ (17.00).
TLTZROZTLT / ZROZ
Gain YTD-3.344-7.43445%
Net Assets46.2B1.6B2,888%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.15100%
Turnover18.0017.00106%
Yield4.755.5885%
Fund Existence24 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLTZROZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZROZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGH65.890.40
+0.60%
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
FELG43.870.20
+0.45%
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
SHDG33.400.12
+0.36%
Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF
MYHB25.010.01
+0.05%
State Street®My2028 HighYield CrptBdETF
MAYU34.57N/A
N/A
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 Unc May ETF