TLT
Price
$81.74
Change
+$1.50 (+1.87%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Net Assets
46.91B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZROZ
Price
$58.74
Change
+$1.62 (+2.84%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Net Assets
1.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TLT vs ZROZ

TLT vs ZROZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) vs. PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index Exchange-Traded Fund (ZROZ)

Key Takeaways

  • TLT and ZROZ both deliver targeted exposure to long-duration U.S. Treasuries but differ in bond structure: TLT holds coupon-paying bonds while ZROZ invests exclusively in zero-coupon STRIPS.
  • TLT tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index with approximately 47 holdings; ZROZ tracks the ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index with roughly 22 holdings.
  • Both ETFs carry identical expense ratios of 0.15% and maintain 100% allocation to U.S. government securities, resulting in high sensitivity to interest-rate movements.
  • ZROZ exhibits higher effective duration due to its zero-coupon composition, amplifying price volatility relative to TLT during shifts in long-term rates.
  • Neither ETF provides credit or sector diversification beyond Treasuries, positioning them as pure duration tools rather than broad fixed-income solutions.
  • Structural differences in coupon versus principal-only exposure create distinct risk-return profiles suited to varying interest-rate outlooks and portfolio duration targets.

Introduction

Long-duration U.S. Treasury exchange-traded funds (ETFs) attract investors seeking to manage interest-rate risk or express views on macroeconomic conditions. TLT and ZROZ both target extended-maturity government debt yet employ different methodologies within the same broad category. They do not compete as direct substitutes but offer complementary or alternative exposures for investors focused on duration extension. TLT provides broad access to coupon-bearing bonds, while ZROZ emphasizes zero-coupon securities. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions to help investors evaluate fit within fixed-income allocations amid evolving rate environments.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) Overview

TLT is a passive ETF issued by BlackRock iShares that seeks to track the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The index comprises U.S. Treasury securities with remaining maturities exceeding 20 years. The fund typically holds around 47 bonds, all rated AA by major agencies. Top holdings consist of recently issued long-term Treasury notes and bonds with maturities concentrated in the 20- to 30-year range. Sector allocation is 100% Treasuries. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As a physically replicated, market-value-weighted index fund, TLT rebalances periodically to maintain index alignment. It offers high liquidity and serves as a liquid vehicle for long-duration government-bond exposure without credit risk.

PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury Index Exchange-Traded Fund (ZROZ) Overview

ZROZ is a passive ETF sponsored by PIMCO that tracks the ICE BofA Long U.S. Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. The index includes only the principal components of long-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds, excluding coupon payments. The fund holds approximately 22 zero-coupon STRIPS securities. All holdings are U.S. government obligations. Sector allocation remains 100% Treasuries. The expense ratio is 0.15%. ZROZ uses physical replication and market-value weighting, with periodic index-driven adjustments. Its zero-coupon structure results in higher duration than coupon-bearing peers, delivering amplified sensitivity to long-term interest-rate changes while providing no interim coupon income.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the long-duration U.S. Treasury segment of the fixed-income market. Macroeconomic drivers include Federal Reserve monetary policy, inflation expectations, and fiscal developments that influence long-term yields. Capital flows into duration products often increase when investors anticipate rate declines or seek defensive positioning against equity volatility. Regulatory and supply factors, such as Treasury issuance patterns, affect index composition and liquidity. Risks center on interest-rate volatility, with potential for significant price swings if long-term rates rise. These ETFs function as pure-duration instruments rather than diversified bond portfolios, making them responsive to broader shifts in economic growth and policy signals.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both TLT and ZROZ have exhibited strong negative correlation with rising long-term yields and positive responses during periods of rate easing. ZROZ’s zero-coupon profile typically produces greater price volatility and larger moves in response to duration-related catalysts compared with TLT. During episodes of sector rotation toward defensive fixed-income assets, TLT’s broader holdings and coupon structure have provided relatively moderated swings. Relative positioning favors TLT for investors seeking slightly lower volatility within long Treasuries, while ZROZ suits those targeting maximum duration extension. Performance differentials arise primarily from the structural gap in effective duration rather than credit or sector differences.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore data-driven insights on ETFs like TLT and ZROZ.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, TLT currently presents a marginally more balanced profile for broad long-duration exposure due to its greater number of holdings and coupon-bearing composition, which may support more consistent liquidity and slightly moderated volatility relative to ZROZ. ZROZ offers compelling duration leverage for investors with specific rate-decline expectations. Tickeron’s AI would assign a modest probabilistic preference to TLT for most duration-focused mandates, while recognizing ZROZ as a specialized alternative when maximum convexity is prioritized. This assessment reflects observable factors including diversification, cost parity, and risk characteristics rather than short-term price movements.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TLT vs. ZROZ commentary
Oct 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TLT is a StrongBuy and ZROZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for TLT with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

TLT in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026

TLT moved above its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 40 of 50 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TLT as a result. In 70 of 95 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TLT just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where TLT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.

Following a +2.01% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TLT advanced for three days, in 194 of 281 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TLT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.

TLT broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for TLT entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for ZROZ with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

ZROZ in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026

ZROZ moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 40 of 48 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ZROZ as a result. In 69 of 91 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ZROZ just turned positive on October 13, 2026. Looking at past instances where ZROZ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.

Following a +3.16% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ZROZ advanced for three days, in 197 of 268 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 7 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ZROZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

ZROZ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for ZROZ entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLTZROZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
TLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZROZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZMAY26.42-0.05
-0.17%
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY)
FCPI56.32-0.62
-1.09%
Fidelity Stocks for Inflation ETF (FCPI)
UPGR20.49-0.36
-1.71%
Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR)
GFLW32.06-0.83
-2.52%
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW)
QSIX41.29-1.17
-2.77%
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX)