Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TNBAX vs WGIFX
TNBAX vs WGIFX Comparison
Open Charts TNBAX vs WGIFX
TNBAX vs WGIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TNBAX vs. WGIFX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TNBAX is a Hold and WGIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WGIFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. TNBAX (294M). WGIFX pays higher dividends than TNBAX: WGIFX (1.52) vs TNBAX (0.55). TNBAX was incepted earlier than WGIFX: TNBAX (12 years) vs WGIFX (18 years). TNBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than WGIFX (0.52). WGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TNBAX (33.00). WGIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBAX: WGIFX (250) vs TNBAX (1000). WGIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.08 vs. TNBAX (3.52). WGIFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.10 vs. TNBAX (28.00).
| TNBAX | WGIFX | TNBAX / WGIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.52 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.52 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.985 | 14.883 | 40% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.52 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.52 | 10.08 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.78 | 50.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.00 | 33.10 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.61 | 98.11 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement