| TPZ | UTG | TPZ / UTG | |
| Gain YTD | 9.131 | 13.559 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 121M | 3.69B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 2.23 | 38% |
| Turnover | 67.00 | 37.00 | 181% |
| Yield | 3.46 | 0.74 | 468% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
| TPZ | UTG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPZ has been loosely correlated with DTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TPZ jumps, then DTM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that UTG and TU have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UTG and TU's prices will move in lockstep.