Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRSSX vs WCMLX
TRSSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TRSSX vs WCMLX
TRSSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TRSSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRSSX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRSSX has more cash in the bank: 4.92B vs. WCMLX (55.3M). TRSSX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: TRSSX (0.28) vs WCMLX (0.00). TRSSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TRSSX (26 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TRSSX (0.66). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. TRSSX (84.10). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSSX: WCMLX (100000) vs TRSSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.47 vs. TRSSX (15.56). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.76 vs. TRSSX (-16.66).
| TRSSX | WCMLX | TRSSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.99 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.760 | 15.334 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.92B | 55.3M | 8,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.56 | 27.47 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.84 | 32.03 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.66 | 0.76 | -2,187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement