Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRSSX vs WCMLX
TRSSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TRSSX vs WCMLX
TRSSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TRSSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRSSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRSSX has more cash in the bank: 4.63B vs. WCMLX (47.9M). TRSSX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: TRSSX (0.28) vs WCMLX (0.00). TRSSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TRSSX (26 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TRSSX (0.66). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. TRSSX (84.10). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSSX: WCMLX (100000) vs TRSSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. TRSSX (4.39). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.21 vs. TRSSX (-20.47).
| TRSSX | WCMLX | TRSSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.99 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.346 | 5.305 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.63B | 47.9M | 9,670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.39 | 6.31 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.87 | 25.24 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.47 | -6.21 | 329% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.11 | N/A | - |