Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRSSX vs WCMLX
TRSSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TRSSX vs WCMLX
TRSSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TRSSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRSSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRSSX has more cash in the bank: 4.64B vs. WCMLX (52.4M). TRSSX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: TRSSX (0.28) vs WCMLX (0.00). TRSSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TRSSX (26 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TRSSX (0.66). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. TRSSX (84.10). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSSX: WCMLX (100000) vs TRSSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. TRSSX (11.82). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. TRSSX (-19.37).
| TRSSX | WCMLX | TRSSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.99 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.377 | 9.375 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.64B | 52.4M | 8,855% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.82 | 25.84 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.02 | 32.13 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.37 | -0.07 | 29,176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement