Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMLX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.32M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.70
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.42M
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 113M vs. WCMLX (42.4M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). TSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TSCPX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). TSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.76 vs. WCMLX (-6.05). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 18.23 vs. TSCPX (-17.02).
| TSCPX | WCMLX | TSCPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.249 | -2.177 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 42.4M | 267% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.76 | -6.05 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | 21.31 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.02 | 18.23 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement