Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMLX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.30
Change-$0.17 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.74
Change-$0.15 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.14M
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 114M vs. WCMLX (44.1M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). TSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TSCPX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.19 vs. TSCPX (1.38). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.37 vs. TSCPX (-19.91).
| TSCPX | WCMLX | TSCPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.314 | 8.009 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 114M | 44.1M | 259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.38 | 6.19 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.34 | 36.44 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.91 | 15.37 | -130% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers