Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMLX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.22
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.76M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). TSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TSCPX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. TSCPX (-7.02). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. TSCPX (-26.76).
| TSCPX | WCMLX | TSCPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.911 | 1.788 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 41.3M | 264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.02 | -3.04 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.88 | 21.43 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.76 | -0.83 | 3,211% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.05 | N/A | - |