Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMLX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.00
Change+$0.08 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.82M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.31
Change+$0.13 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. WCMLX (43M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TSCPX (25 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.21). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). TSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TSCPX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). TSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. WCMLX (-1.22). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.83 vs. TSCPX (-15.94).
| TSCPX | WCMLX | TSCPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.243 | -5.288 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112M | 43M | 260% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.29 | -1.22 | -271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.88 | 10.63 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.94 | 13.83 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement