Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMLX
TSCPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 100M vs. WCMLX (47.2M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TSCPX (27 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.27). TSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). TSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TSCPX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). TSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.57 vs. WCMLX (2.81). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. TSCPX (-25.98).
| TSCPX | WCMLX | TSCPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.99 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.79 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.030 | 3.852 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 100M | 47.2M | 212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 2.81 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 23.40 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.98 | -7.51 | 346% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement