Ad is loading...
TSCPX vs WCMNX
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMNX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$11.40
Change+$0.22 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.94M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.64
Change+$0.13 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMNX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 105M vs. WCMNX (42.1M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: TSCPX (25 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.21). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSCPX: WCMNX (1000) vs TSCPX (2000). TSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.78 vs. WCMNX (-7.10). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.77 vs. TSCPX (-12.04).
| TSCPX | WCMNX | TSCPX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.11 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.374 | -9.299 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105M | 42.1M | 249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.78 | -7.10 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.62 | 14.99 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.04 | 19.77 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...