Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMNX
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMNX
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth N
Price$12.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.49
Change+$0.08 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 115M vs. WCMNX (44.8M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: TSCPX (26 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.22). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TSCPX (74.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSCPX: WCMNX (1000) vs TSCPX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.52 vs. TSCPX (1.81). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 15.60 vs. TSCPX (-19.62).
| TSCPX | WCMNX | TSCPX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.04 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.486 | 5.674 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115M | 44.8M | 257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 4.52 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.07 | 21.91 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.62 | 15.60 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement