Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TSCPX vs WCMNX
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts TSCPX vs WCMNX
TSCPX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSCPX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSCPX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSCPX has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. WCMNX (51.9M). TSCPX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . TSCPX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: TSCPX (27 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than TSCPX (1.27). TSCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. WCMNX (89.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSCPX: WCMNX (1000) vs TSCPX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.65 vs. TSCPX (14.07). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. TSCPX (-18.07).
| TSCPX | WCMNX | TSCPX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.04 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.073 | 11.144 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106M | 51.9M | 204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.07 | 16.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.37 | 31.41 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.07 | 1.76 | -1,029% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers