Investors seeking amplified exposure within the consumer discretionary space often evaluate leveraged ETFs for tactical opportunities. TSLL and WANT both target this sector through daily leveraged strategies but differ fundamentally in scope and construction. TSLL concentrates on one prominent electric vehicle manufacturer, while WANT spreads exposure across the wider consumer discretionary sector. These ETFs do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they represent alternative approaches to achieving leveraged returns in overlapping yet distinct segments of the market. The comparison highlights how single-stock versus sector-level leverage influences diversification, volatility, and alignment with broader economic trends such as consumer spending and technological adoption.
The Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares (TSLL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Launched in August 2022, it is a non-diversified, leveraged ETF that uses swap agreements and other derivatives to achieve its objective. The fund typically holds a small direct position in TSLA alongside substantial cash equivalents and derivative instruments, resulting in approximately 14 holdings. Top exposures center on TSLA and treasury cash management vehicles. The net expense ratio is 0.83%. As a passive, single-stock leveraged product, it resets daily and requires active monitoring due to compounding effects over multiple periods.
The Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Launched in November 2018, it provides leveraged exposure to a basket of U.S. consumer discretionary companies spanning retail, automobiles, hospitality, and apparel. The fund employs swaps and derivatives with daily rebalancing and maintains around 50-60 positions when including index swaps and cash instruments. Prominent holdings include AMZN, TSLA, HD, and others from the underlying index. The net expense ratio is 1.00%. This passive, sector-focused leveraged ETF resets exposure each trading day.
The consumer discretionary sector encompasses companies sensitive to economic cycles, consumer confidence, and discretionary spending patterns. Key drivers include retail sales trends, automotive demand, travel recovery, and e-commerce growth. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments, inflation pressures, and employment levels influence capital flows into the sector. Regulatory developments around electric vehicles and trade policies can affect specific constituents. Both ETFs operate within this environment, where sector rotation and earnings momentum in leading names like online retailers and automakers shape performance dynamics over market cycles.
In recent market cycles, TSLL has exhibited heightened sensitivity to movements in its single underlying name, leading to amplified volatility relative to broader sector benchmarks. WANT, with its 3x leverage and diversified holdings, has shown performance tied to aggregate sector trends, including rotation into or out of consumer spending themes. During periods of strong earnings growth among top index components, WANT may capture broader participation, whereas TSLL responds more acutely to company-specific catalysts. Relative positioning favors WANT for investors seeking sector-wide momentum and TSLL for targeted, high-conviction bets, with both carrying elevated risk from leverage and daily reset mechanics.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.
Based on structural strength, diversification profile, and sector momentum factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to WANT. Its broader exposure across multiple consumer discretionary names reduces single-stock concentration risk compared to TSLL, while the 3x leverage provides amplified participation in sector trends. Cost efficiency and consistent trend alignment across a diversified basket further support this probabilistic assessment, though both products remain high-risk vehicles best suited for sophisticated, short-term strategies.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| TSLL | WANT | TSLL / WANT | |
| Gain YTD | -48.394 | -26.574 | 182% |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 18.3M | 19,956% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.00 | 83% |
| Turnover | 101.00 | 63.00 | 160% |
| Yield | 3.84 | 0.55 | 703% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
| TSLL | WANT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| APLX | 8.34 | 0.34 | +4.25% |
| Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF | |||
| FDRR | 70.06 | 0.79 | +1.14% |
| Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | |||
| NAPR | 60.33 | 0.20 | +0.34% |
| Innovator Nasdaq-100 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr | |||
| IBGB | 23.02 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Trsy ETF | |||
| JCPB | 45.47 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLL has been closely correlated with TSLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSLL jumps, then TSLA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSLL | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| TSLA - TSLL | 100% Closely correlated | +0.52% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WANT has been loosely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WANT jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WANT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WANT | 100% | +2.49% | ||
| CCL - WANT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| HD - WANT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| MHK - WANT | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| NCLH - WANT | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| RL - WANT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||