TSLL
Price
$9.71
Change
+$0.09 (+0.94%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
3.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WANT
Price
$36.69
Change
+$0.89 (+2.49%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
18.33M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TSLL vs WANT

TSLL vs WANT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 02, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares (TSLL) vs. Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT)

Key Takeaways

  • TSLL provides 2x daily leveraged exposure to a single stock, TSLA, resulting in concentrated risk and high volatility tied directly to one company's performance.
  • WANT delivers 3x daily leveraged exposure to the broader Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, offering diversified sector participation across multiple industries including retail, automobiles, and leisure.
  • Both ETFs employ synthetic strategies using swaps and derivatives with daily rebalancing, making them suitable primarily for short-term tactical trading rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.83% (net) for TSLL and 1.00% (net) for WANT, reflecting the higher costs associated with leveraged products compared to unleveraged equity ETFs.
  • TSLL features fewer holdings focused on cash equivalents and TSLA-linked instruments, while WANT maintains broader exposure with top constituents including AMZN, TSLA, and HD.
  • Structural differences position TSLL as a high-conviction single-name tool and WANT as a leveraged sector bet, with distinct risk profiles driven by concentration versus breadth.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified exposure within the consumer discretionary space often evaluate leveraged ETFs for tactical opportunities. TSLL and WANT both target this sector through daily leveraged strategies but differ fundamentally in scope and construction. TSLL concentrates on one prominent electric vehicle manufacturer, while WANT spreads exposure across the wider consumer discretionary sector. These ETFs do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they represent alternative approaches to achieving leveraged returns in overlapping yet distinct segments of the market. The comparison highlights how single-stock versus sector-level leverage influences diversification, volatility, and alignment with broader economic trends such as consumer spending and technological adoption.

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares (TSLL) Overview

The Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares (TSLL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Launched in August 2022, it is a non-diversified, leveraged ETF that uses swap agreements and other derivatives to achieve its objective. The fund typically holds a small direct position in TSLA alongside substantial cash equivalents and derivative instruments, resulting in approximately 14 holdings. Top exposures center on TSLA and treasury cash management vehicles. The net expense ratio is 0.83%. As a passive, single-stock leveraged product, it resets daily and requires active monitoring due to compounding effects over multiple periods.

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) Overview

The Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Launched in November 2018, it provides leveraged exposure to a basket of U.S. consumer discretionary companies spanning retail, automobiles, hospitality, and apparel. The fund employs swaps and derivatives with daily rebalancing and maintains around 50-60 positions when including index swaps and cash instruments. Prominent holdings include AMZN, TSLA, HD, and others from the underlying index. The net expense ratio is 1.00%. This passive, sector-focused leveraged ETF resets exposure each trading day.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The consumer discretionary sector encompasses companies sensitive to economic cycles, consumer confidence, and discretionary spending patterns. Key drivers include retail sales trends, automotive demand, travel recovery, and e-commerce growth. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments, inflation pressures, and employment levels influence capital flows into the sector. Regulatory developments around electric vehicles and trade policies can affect specific constituents. Both ETFs operate within this environment, where sector rotation and earnings momentum in leading names like online retailers and automakers shape performance dynamics over market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, TSLL has exhibited heightened sensitivity to movements in its single underlying name, leading to amplified volatility relative to broader sector benchmarks. WANT, with its 3x leverage and diversified holdings, has shown performance tied to aggregate sector trends, including rotation into or out of consumer spending themes. During periods of strong earnings growth among top index components, WANT may capture broader participation, whereas TSLL responds more acutely to company-specific catalysts. Relative positioning favors WANT for investors seeking sector-wide momentum and TSLL for targeted, high-conviction bets, with both carrying elevated risk from leverage and daily reset mechanics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, diversification profile, and sector momentum factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to WANT. Its broader exposure across multiple consumer discretionary names reduces single-stock concentration risk compared to TSLL, while the 3x leverage provides amplified participation in sector trends. Cost efficiency and consistent trend alignment across a diversified basket further support this probabilistic assessment, though both products remain high-risk vehicles best suited for sophisticated, short-term strategies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TSLL vs. WANT commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSLL is a Hold and WANT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSLL has more net assets: 3.65B vs. WANT (18.3M). WANT has a higher annual dividend yield than TSLL: WANT (-26.574) vs TSLL (-48.394). TSLL was incepted earlier than WANT: TSLL (4 years) vs WANT (8 years). TSLL (0.83) has a lower expense ratio than WANT (1.00). TSLL has a higher turnover WANT (63.00) vs WANT (63.00).
TSLLWANTTSLL / WANT
Gain YTD-48.394-26.574182%
Net Assets3.65B18.3M19,956%
Total Expense Ratio0.831.0083%
Turnover101.0063.00160%
Yield3.840.55703%
Fund Existence4 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TSLLWANT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
TSLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WANT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APLX8.340.34
+4.25%
Tradr 2X Long APLD Daily ETF
FDRR70.060.79
+1.14%
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
NAPR60.330.20
+0.34%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
IBGB23.020.01
+0.02%
iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Trsy ETF
JCPB45.47-0.06
-0.13%
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF

TSLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSLL has been closely correlated with TSLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSLL jumps, then TSLA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSLL
1D Price
Change %
TSLL100%
+0.94%
TSLA - TSLL
100%
Closely correlated
+0.52%

WANT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WANT has been loosely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WANT jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WANT
1D Price
Change %
WANT100%
+2.49%
CCL - WANT
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
HD - WANT
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
MHK - WANT
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
NCLH - WANT
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
RL - WANT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
More