The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
| TYG | UMI | TYG / UMI | |
| Gain YTD | 13.786 | 28.833 | 48% |
| Net Assets | 957M | 525M | 182% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.69 | 309% |
| Turnover | 127.40 | 41.00 | 311% |
| Yield | 12.21 | 5.78 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| TYG | UMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TYG and HESM have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYG and HESM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYG | 100% | -1.16% | ||
| HESM - TYG | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| EPD - TYG | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| OKE - TYG | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| TRGP - TYG | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| WMB - TYG | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMI has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMI jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.