Advertisement
TZOO vs WPPGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TZOO is a Hold and WPPGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TZOO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWPPGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- TZOO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WPPGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TZOO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPPGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TZOO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WPPGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
TZOO (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -1.22% price change this week, while WPPGF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was -10.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.78%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -3.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
TZOO is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-0.69% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
@Advertising/Marketing Services (-3.22% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| TZOO | WPPGF | TZOO / WPPGF | |
| Capitalization | 108M | 5.33B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 17.3M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -51.429 | -52.728 | 98% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.77 | 10.68 | 101% |
| Revenue | 85.1M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 11.5M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.94M | N/A | - |
TZOO | WPPGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 92 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WPPGF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TZOO (95) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that WPPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than TZOO’s over the last 12 months.
TZOO's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as WPPGF (100) in the null industry. This means that TZOO’s stock grew similarly to WPPGF’s over the last 12 months.
TZOO's SMR Rating (9) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for WPPGF (94) in the null industry. This means that TZOO’s stock grew significantly faster than WPPGF’s over the last 12 months.
TZOO's Price Growth Rating (92) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as WPPGF (92) in the null industry. This means that TZOO’s stock grew similarly to WPPGF’s over the last 12 months.
TZOO's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as WPPGF (98) in the null industry. This means that TZOO’s stock grew similarly to WPPGF’s over the last 12 months.
| TZOO | WPPGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | 30 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 52% |
Advertisement
TZOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TZOO has been loosely correlated with QNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TZOO jumps, then QNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TZOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TZOO | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| QNST - TZOO | 35% Loosely correlated | -4.48% | ||
| FVRR - TZOO | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| OPRA - TZOO | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| MGNI - TZOO | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
| SNAP - TZOO | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.97% | ||
More | ||||
WPPGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WPPGF and DLX have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WPPGF and DLX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WPPGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPPGF | 100% | -8.33% | ||
| DLX - WPPGF | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| WPP - WPPGF | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| TZOO - WPPGF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| CNET - WPPGF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| ADV - WPPGF | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.72% | ||
More | ||||