UAVS
Price
$0.91
Change
-$0.02 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jun 15 closing price
Capitalization
53.5M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMAC
Price
$24.73
Change
+$0.30 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jun 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

UAVS vs UMAC

Header iconUAVS vs UMAC Comparison
Open Charts UAVS vs UMACBanner chart's image
UAVS vs UMAC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AgEagle Aerial Systems (UAVS) vs. Unusual Machines (UMAC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both UAVS and UMAC operate in the burgeoning drone sector, with UAVS focusing on complete unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and sensors, while UMAC specializes in drone components and parts.
  • UMAC boasts stronger year-to-date gains at 23.90% and a remarkable 228% one-year return, compared to UAVS's 44.79% YTD and 16% annual performance.
  • Recent defense-related contracts have bolstered UAVS sentiment, including U.S. Army orders for eBee VISION UAS, while UMAC secured a $5 million drone order and expanded manufacturing.
  • UMAC's larger market cap of $754 million reflects greater scale versus UAVS's $67 million, suggesting higher liquidity and investor interest.
  • Volatility remains high for both, with UMAC showing sharper price swings amid capital raises and partnerships.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving drone and unmanned aerial systems market, UAVS and UMAC represent distinct approaches to capturing growth in defense, commercial, and industrial applications. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent market performance, and key catalysts amid heightened demand for UAS technology driven by geopolitical tensions and regulatory tailwinds. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term sector exposure will find value in understanding their relative positioning, risk profiles, and growth trajectories in today's dynamic market environment.

UAVS Overview and Recent Performance

AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS), operating as EagleNXT, designs and delivers autonomous UAS, sensors, and software-as-a-service (SaaS) solutions for agriculture, defense, public safety, and surveying. With trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of $12.81 million and shares trading around $1.17 within a 52-week range of $0.72 to $3.61, the stock has shown resilience with 44.79% YTD gains.

In recent weeks, UAVS benefited from defense wins, including sales of nine eBee VISION intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) UAS kits to the U.S. Army National Training Center and a 15-unit order from a U.S. Army unit in Europe. A $10 million stake acquisition in Israel's ThirdEye Systems Ltd. launched a U.S. joint venture for counter-drone systems, enhancing its pipeline. Fiscal 2025 results showed narrower losses and improved margins, though shares remain volatile amid penny stock dynamics, influencing mixed sentiment.

UMAC Overview and Recent Performance

Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC) engages in the commercial drone industry, manufacturing and distributing small drones and components via B2B, e-commerce, and retail channels. Trading near $15.79 with a 52-week range of $4.67 to $23.38 and a $754 million market cap, it posted TTM revenue of $11.2 million alongside a year-to-date return of 23.90% and 228% over one year.

Recent market activity for UMAC featured a $5 million-plus order from PowerUS for counter-unmanned aerial systems (UAS) drones, accelerating motor factory output in Orlando. Appointments like Vice President of FP&A and collaborations, such as with Lantronix for AI-integrated flight controls, underscore expansion. Despite a March public offering diluting shares and causing dips, Q4 2025 revenue hit $4.9 million, fostering positive momentum amid sector volatility.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page highlights the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ machine learning for real-time signals, risk management, and diverse strategies like swing trading or sector-specific plays, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standouts show annualized returns up to 121%, win rates of 55-87%, profit factors exceeding 3.0, and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 10, trading assets like semiconductors (NVDA, AMD), industrials, and gold miners. Curated for current conditions, they offer varied styles—short-term scalps to multi-day holds—empowering users to copy proven performances. Explore these bots to align with market trends.

Head-to-Head Comparison

UAVS emphasizes end-to-end UAS platforms with SaaS integration, targeting defense and precision agriculture, while UMAC focuses on scalable components, enabling broader distribution and partnerships. Growth drivers differ: UAVS leverages Army contracts and counter-drone JVs for defense exposure; UMAC benefits from reshoring mandates and component demand.

Recent momentum favors UMAC's explosive 228% annual gains versus UAVS's steadier but lower returns, though both face risks from dilution events and execution in competitive drone markets. Sector overlap in UAS amplifies shared tailwinds like U.S. production incentives, but UMAC's larger cap signals stronger sentiment, trading off UAVS's niche catalysts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward UMAC, citing its superior trend consistency, substantial revenue scaling, and elevated relative positioning in the drone ecosystem. While UAVS shows promising defense catalysts, UMAC's momentum and scale suggest higher probability of outperformance in prevailing conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
UAVS vs. UMAC commentary
Jun 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UAVS is a Buy and UMAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2026
Stock price -- (UAVS: $0.91 vs. UMAC: $24.73)
Brand notoriety: UAVS and UMAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UAVS: 49% vs. UMAC: 82%
Market capitalization -- UAVS: $53.5M vs. UMAC: $1.18B
UAVS [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $53.5M. UMAC’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $1.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $265.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $28.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UAVS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • UAVS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMAC is a better buy in the long-term than UAVS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UAVS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • UAVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UMAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMAC is a better buy in the short-term than UAVS.

Price Growth

UAVS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -4.76% price change this week, while UMAC (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -4.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

UMAC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (+4.48% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UMAC($1.18B) has a higher market cap than UAVS($53.5M). UMAC YTD gains are higher at: 94.113 vs. UAVS (12.190). UMAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.49M vs. UAVS (-16.85M). UMAC has more cash in the bank: 284M vs. UAVS (36.4M). UMAC has less debt than UAVS: UMAC (3.33M) vs UAVS (3.91M). UMAC has higher revenues than UAVS: UMAC (17.3M) vs UAVS (10.6M).
UAVSUMACUAVS / UMAC
Capitalization53.5M1.18B5%
EBITDA-16.85M-5.49M307%
Gain YTD12.19094.11313%
P/E Ratio0.03N/A-
Revenue10.6M17.3M61%
Total Cash36.4M284M13%
Total Debt3.91M3.33M117%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UAVS: Fundamental Ratings
UAVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UAVSUMAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UAVS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLCRX30.00N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R
MGPIX127.57N/A
N/A
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Inv
VRTTX634.57N/A
N/A
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index I
RGFTX10.83N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
JARSX16.42N/A
N/A
Easterly Global Real Estate R6

UAVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UAVS has been loosely correlated with UMAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UAVS jumps, then UMAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UAVS
1D Price
Change %
UAVS100%
-1.58%
UMAC - UAVS
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
BTCT - UAVS
42%
Loosely correlated
+10.48%
QBTS - UAVS
41%
Loosely correlated
+12.37%
RGTI - UAVS
38%
Loosely correlated
+8.20%
CAN - UAVS
37%
Loosely correlated
+9.68%
More

UMAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMAC has been loosely correlated with UAVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMAC jumps, then UAVS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMAC
1D Price
Change %
UMAC100%
+1.23%
UAVS - UMAC
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
QUBT - UMAC
46%
Loosely correlated
+11.78%
RGTI - UMAC
44%
Loosely correlated
+8.20%
QBTS - UMAC
43%
Loosely correlated
+12.37%
IONQ - UMAC
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.76%
More