UGA
Price
$150.29
Change
+$6.97 (+4.86%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Net Assets
182.4M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USOI
Price
$44.53
Change
+$0.79 (+1.81%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Net Assets
321.31M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

UGA vs USOI

UGA vs USOI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 17, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) vs. UBS ETRACS Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI)

Key Takeaways

  • United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) provides direct exposure to gasoline futures prices, while UBS ETRACS Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) implements a covered call strategy on crude oil exposure, generating income through option premiums.
  • UGA operates as a commodity pool with an expense ratio around 1.0%, focusing on near-month RBOB gasoline futures contracts, whereas USOI is an exchange-traded note (ETN) with a 0.85% expense ratio and monthly distributions from its covered call approach.
  • UGA typically holds one primary futures contract plus cash equivalents, resulting in concentrated commodity risk, compared to USOI's notional structure tied to the United States Oil Fund, LP (USO) with capped upside potential.
  • Both ETFs target the energy commodities sector but differ in risk profiles: UGA offers unhedged gasoline price sensitivity, while USOI reduces volatility through covered calls at the expense of full participation in crude oil rallies.
  • Structural distinctions include UGA's futures-based commodity pool versus USOI's ETN format, which carries issuer credit risk but enables higher yield distribution.
  • Investors seeking pure commodity price exposure may prefer UGA, whereas those prioritizing income generation within oil markets may consider USOI's strategy.

Introduction

United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) and UBS ETRACS Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) both offer exposure to energy commodities but pursue distinct strategies within the oil and gas sector. They do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they represent alternative approaches for investors seeking commodity-linked returns. UGA targets gasoline price movements through futures, while USOI combines crude oil exposure with a covered call overlay to enhance yield. This comparison highlights their structural differences and positioning amid fluctuating energy markets and macroeconomic influences.

United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) Overview

United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) is a commodity pool designed to track the daily percentage changes in the price of gasoline, measured by near-month reformulated gasoline blendstock for oxygen blending (RBOB) futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). The fund primarily invests in these futures, rolling contracts as they approach expiration, supplemented by cash and short-term Treasury holdings for collateral. It maintains a small number of holdings, typically centered on one active futures position plus cash equivalents. The expense ratio stands at approximately 1.0%. As a passive futures-based vehicle, UGA provides unleveraged, concentrated exposure to gasoline prices without equity holdings or sector diversification beyond energy commodities.

UBS ETRACS Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) Overview

UBS ETRACS Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) is an exchange-traded note (ETN) that seeks returns linked to the Credit Suisse NASDAQ WTI Crude Oil FLOWS 106 Index. This index reflects a covered call strategy on shares of the United States Oil Fund, LP (USO), incorporating price changes in crude oil exposure plus premiums from notional monthly call options sold out-of-the-money. The ETN structure has no underlying holdings and carries issuer credit risk. It features an expense ratio of 0.85% and distributes variable monthly coupons derived from option premiums. USOI offers a passive, income-oriented approach to crude oil with reduced volatility compared to direct futures exposure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The energy commodities sector, encompassing crude oil and refined products like gasoline, remains influenced by global supply dynamics, geopolitical developments, and demand trends tied to economic growth and transportation needs. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and inventory levels affect pricing across the complex. Regulatory considerations around futures markets and commodity trading apply to both products. Capital flows into energy commodities often respond to broader inflation hedging themes or seasonal demand patterns, while risks include price volatility from weather events, OPEC decisions, and shifts in refining margins.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, UGA has exhibited higher sensitivity to gasoline-specific supply disruptions and refining margins, leading to distinct volatility patterns versus broader crude benchmarks. USOI's covered call mechanism has tempered drawdowns during oil price swings while providing income, though it limits gains in strong upward moves. Relative positioning shows UGA aligning more closely with refined product trends and USOI with crude oil momentum moderated by option overlays. Both respond to sector rotation within energy but through different transmission mechanisms, with USOI generally displaying lower realized volatility due to its strategy.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, USOI presents a probabilistic edge in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, income-generating covered call strategy, and moderated risk profile within the energy sector. UGA offers compelling direct exposure but carries higher costs and concentration. Tickeron’s AI would likely favor USOI for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and yield alongside commodity exposure, while noting both suit tactical allocations depending on individual risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
UGA vs. USOI commentary
Sep 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UGA is a Hold and USOI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UGAUSOI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
UGA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USOI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMGAX19.120.17
+0.90%
Alger Mid Cap Growth A
TEFQX5.130.02
+0.39%
Firsthand Technology Opportunities
MMUJX24.14-0.05
-0.21%
MFS Utilities R4
MSFBX26.83-0.09
-0.33%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Franchise A
LCEFX19.70-0.07
-0.35%
Invesco Diversified Dividend R6