UNCFF
Price
$63.95
Change
-$1.72 (-2.62%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
45.77B
UNIF
Price
$3.00
Change
-$0.01 (-0.33%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
60.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

UNCFF vs UNIF

Header iconUNCFF vs UNIF Comparison
Open Charts UNCFF vs UNIFBanner chart's image
UniCredito Spa
Price$63.95
Change-$1.72 (-2.62%)
Volume$5.13K
Capitalization45.77B
U & I Financial
Price$3.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.33%)
Volume$683
Capitalization60.94M
UNCFF vs UNIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UNCFF vs. UNIF commentary
Jun 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UNCFF is a Hold and UNIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 01, 2025
Stock price -- (UNCFF: $63.95 vs. UNIF: $3.00)
Brand notoriety: UNCFF and UNIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UNCFF: 43% vs. UNIF: 20%
Market capitalization -- UNCFF: $45.77B vs. UNIF: $60.94M
UNCFF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $45.77B. UNIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $60.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UNCFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUNIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • UNCFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UNIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNCFF is a better buy in the long-term than UNIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UNCFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UNCFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

UNCFF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while UNIF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.71% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNCFF($45.8B) has a higher market cap than UNIF($60.9M). UNIF (5.46) and UNCFF (5.29) have similar P/E ratio . UNCFF YTD gains are higher at: 59.817 vs. UNIF (-9.366). UNIF has less debt than UNCFF: UNIF (10M) vs UNCFF (93B). UNCFF has higher revenues than UNIF: UNCFF (23.1B) vs UNIF (28.7M).
UNCFFUNIFUNCFF / UNIF
Capitalization45.8B60.9M75,205%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD59.817-9.366-639%
P/E Ratio5.295.4697%
Revenue23.1B28.7M80,488%
Total CashN/A31.1M-
Total Debt93B10M930,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UNCFF vs UNIF: Fundamental Ratings
UNCFF
UNIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5100
SMR RATING
1..100
394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3883
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1690
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNIF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNCFF (99). This means that UNIF’s stock grew significantly faster than UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNIF (100). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew significantly faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNIF (94). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew significantly faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNIF (83). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNIF (90). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew significantly faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UNCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLKC22.23N/A
N/A
Invesco Aln Glxy Blkh Usr&Dctrzd Cmr ETF
BSMU21.37-0.01
-0.07%
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Muncpl Bd ETF
FIW105.68-0.16
-0.16%
First Trust Water ETF
STK28.34-0.21
-0.74%
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
MKOR23.84-0.33
-1.36%
Matthews Korea Active ETF

UNCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCFF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCFF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCFF
1D Price
Change %
UNCFF100%
-2.61%
ISNPY - UNCFF
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
CRZBY - UNCFF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
BKRIY - UNCFF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
MDIBY - UNCFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
KBCSY - UNCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More

UNIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNIF and FLG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNIF and FLG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNIF
1D Price
Change %
UNIF100%
N/A
FLG - UNIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
PSBQ - UNIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
UOVEF - UNIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNIB - UNIF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCFF - UNIF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
More