It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
VALE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWWR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
VALE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
VALE (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.16% price change this week, while WWR (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.
VALE is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
WWR is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
VALE | WWR | VALE / WWR | |
Capitalization | 51.9B | 28.1M | 184,698% |
EBITDA | 15B | -13.05M | -114,943% |
Gain YTD | -24.828 | 8.887 | -279% |
P/E Ratio | 6.62 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 40.7B | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 2.92B | 10.9M | 26,798% |
Total Debt | 16.4B | 357K | 4,593,838% |
VALE | WWR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VALE's Valuation (7) in the Steel industry is in the same range as WWR (23) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew similarly to WWR’s over the last 12 months.
VALE's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWR (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWR’s over the last 12 months.
VALE's SMR Rating (38) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WWR (92) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew somewhat faster than WWR’s over the last 12 months.
WWR's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as VALE (59) in the Steel industry. This means that WWR’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.
VALE's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Steel industry is in the same range as WWR (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew similarly to WWR’s over the last 12 months.
VALE | WWR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 14 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago72% | 5 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago58% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that WWR and MTRN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WWR and MTRN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WWR | 100% | +0.84% | ||
MTRN - WWR | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
BHP - WWR | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
VALE - WWR | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
RIO - WWR | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
UAMY - WWR | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.56% | ||
More |