VEA
Price
$69.33
Change
-$0.30 (-0.43%)
Updated
Apr 20 closing price
Net Assets
282.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VXUS
Price
$83.11
Change
-$0.37 (-0.44%)
Updated
Apr 21, 10:37 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
582.27B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

VEA vs VXUS

Header iconVEA vs VXUS Comparison
Open Charts VEA vs VXUSBanner chart's image
VEA vs VXUS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) vs. Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS)

Key Takeaways

  • VEA provides targeted exposure to developed markets ex-US with ~3,900 holdings and a rock-bottom 0.03% expense ratio, ideal for cost-conscious diversification.
  • VXUS offers broader global ex-US coverage including ~25-27% emerging markets across ~8,700 holdings, but at a slightly higher 0.05% expense ratio.
  • Both are passively managed index trackers with low turnover (VEA ~3%, VXUS ~4%), emphasizing financials (~24%) and industrials (~18%) as key sectors.
  • VEA exhibits lower volatility due to exclusion of emerging markets, suiting conservative international allocation strategies.
  • Recent capital flows favor international equities amid sector rotation from U.S. tech concentration, benefiting both but highlighting VEA's stability.
  • VEA's superior cost efficiency and developed-market focus position it for relative outperformance in stable macro environments.

Introduction

VEA and VXUS represent cornerstone options for U.S. investors seeking international equity exposure beyond domestic markets. VEA targets developed markets outside the U.S., offering stability through large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks in Europe, the Pacific, and Canada. VXUS provides a more comprehensive alternative by blending developed and emerging markets, capturing broader global diversification. These ETFs compete indirectly, appealing to similar goals of reducing U.S.-centric risk amid ongoing sector rotation and capital flows into undervalued international assets. In the current environment of moderating U.S. growth dominance and favorable developed-market valuations, comparing their structures illuminates optimal positioning for long-term portfolios.

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) Overview

The VEA is a passive index ETF tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, which includes approximately 3,900 stocks from large-, mid-, and small-cap companies in developed markets like Europe (51%), Pacific (36%), North America (Canada, 11%), and the Middle East (1%). Key distinguishing features include its ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03% and minimal turnover of 2.9%, reflecting efficient full-replication indexing with quarterly rebalancing to match index weights.

Top holdings (as of January 2026) feature diversified leaders: ASML Holding NV (1.85%), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (1.70%), SK hynix Inc. (1.11%), Roche Holding AG (1.04%), and HSBC Holdings plc (0.99%). Sector allocations emphasize financials (23.7%), industrials (18.5%), consumer discretionary (10.3%), technology (9.7%), and health care (9.0%), providing balanced exposure without emerging market volatility. This structure suits investors prioritizing liquidity, low costs, and stable developed-market growth.

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) Overview

VXUS passively tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, encompassing ~8,700 holdings across developed and emerging markets for comprehensive ex-U.S. equity representation. With an expense ratio of 0.05% and turnover of 4.4%, it employs index replication, rebalancing quarterly to reflect regional weightings: Europe (38%), Pacific (26%), emerging markets (27%), North America (8%), and others.

Top holdings (as of January 2026) include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (3.17%), ASML Holding NV (1.33%), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (1.22%), Tencent Holdings Ltd. (1.12%), and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. (0.90%). Sectors mirror broad international trends: financials (23%), industrials (16%), technology (15%), consumer discretionary (11%), and basic materials (7%). VXUS's inclusion of emerging markets adds growth potential but introduces higher risk, making it suitable for globally diversified strategies.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

International equities, particularly developed markets, navigate a dynamic macro landscape marked by capital rotations from U.S. tech concentration toward undervalued regions. Recent record ETF inflows—$68 billion into international funds in early 2026—signal investor appetite amid cheaper valuations (P/E ~17x vs. U.S. ~22x) and higher yields. Europe benefits from fiscal stimulus in Germany and robust Japanese growth, while Pacific cyclicals gain from manufacturing resurgence.

Sector drivers include financials and industrials momentum from rate easing expectations, alongside commodity trends supporting materials. Risks encompass geopolitical tensions, currency fluctuations, and emerging market volatility, though regulatory stability in developed economies provides a buffer. This environment underscores demand for broad ex-U.S. exposure as diversification catalysts evolve.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, VEA has edged VXUS in relative positioning, with YTD gains around 3-5% outpacing VXUS's 2-4% through early 2026, driven by developed markets' resilience amid emerging volatility. Over broader cycles, both delivered strong advances in 2025 (~32-35%), but VEA's lower beta reduces drawdowns during EM pullbacks.

Performance ties to sector rotation into financials and industrials, bolstered by Europe's earnings stability and Japan's policy support. VEA benefits from consistent developed cyclicals amid interest rate normalization, while VXUS captures EM upside yet faces headwinds from China exposure. Geopolitical shifts and commodity strength favor VEA's lower volatility profile in risk-off phases.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Among hundreds of bots analyzing thousands of tickers across various timeframes and strategies—from momentum and mean reversion to pattern recognition—the curated section highlights only the strongest, often delivering win rates above 60% and Sharpe ratios exceeding 1.5 in backtests and live trading. These bots adapt to volatility, sector shifts, and macro trends, providing signals for equities, ETFs, and options. Investors can explore, backtest, and deploy them seamlessly. Visit the page to identify bots aligned with your risk tolerance and discover an edge in today's dynamic markets.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors VEA for its unmatched cost efficiency (0.03% expense ratio), superior diversification within stable developed markets, lower volatility, and alignment with ongoing rotations into international value sectors. While VXUS's emerging exposure offers growth potential, VEA's structural advantages and trend consistency yield a higher probabilistic edge in the prevailing environment of U.S. de-risking and developed resilience.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
VEA vs. VXUS commentary
Apr 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VEA is a Hold and VXUS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VXUS has more net assets: 582B vs. VEA (282B). VEA (11.045) and VXUS (10.705) have matching annual dividend yield . VEA was incepted earlier than VXUS: VEA (19 years) vs VXUS (15 years). VEA (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than VXUS (0.05). VEA (4.00) and VXUS (4.00) have matching turnover.
VEAVXUSVEA / VXUS
Gain YTD11.04510.705103%
Net Assets282B582B48%
Total Expense Ratio0.030.0560%
Turnover4.004.00100%
Yield2.942.9998%
Fund Existence19 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VEAVXUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VXUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBR42.390.27
+0.63%
ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped
ONEV140.290.30
+0.21%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Russell 1000 LwVolFocETF
VWOB67.49-0.02
-0.03%
Vanguard Emerging Mkts Govt Bd ETF
TEKY39.04-0.08
-0.20%
Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF
SPPP16.47-0.23
-1.38%
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust