VFLO
Price
$53.00
Change
-$0.58 (-1.08%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
11.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VOE
Price
$202.20
Change
-$1.21 (-0.59%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
24.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

VFLO vs VOE

VFLO vs VOE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) vs. Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE)

Key Takeaways

  • VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) employs a rules-based strategy targeting approximately 50 large-cap U.S. companies with high free cash flow yields and growth characteristics, resulting in concentrated exposure to information technology, energy, and health care sectors.
  • Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) passively tracks a broad mid-cap value index with roughly 170-180 holdings, offering diversified exposure across financials, industrials, energy, and utilities at a significantly lower expense ratio.
  • VFLO carries a net expense ratio of 0.39%, reflecting its active screening methodology, while VOE maintains a net expense ratio of 0.05% as a low-cost index tracker.
  • Structural differences include VFLO’s focus on free cash flow metrics versus VOE’s emphasis on traditional value factors such as book-to-price and earnings-to-price ratios within the mid-cap segment.
  • VFLO provides thematic positioning toward companies generating strong cash generation, potentially appealing in environments favoring quality and profitability, whereas VOE delivers broad mid-cap value exposure suited for long-term sector rotation strategies.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed with full physical replication of their respective indexes, though VFLO’s narrower holdings list introduces higher concentration risk compared to VOE’s diversified portfolio.

Introduction

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) represent distinct approaches to U.S. equity value investing. VFLO targets large-cap companies screened for superior free cash flow characteristics, while VOE provides broad exposure to mid-cap value stocks. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer investors alternative strategies for accessing value-oriented segments of the market. The comparison highlights differences in market-cap focus, sector tilts, cost structures, and methodology that may influence suitability depending on investor objectives and market conditions.

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) Overview

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) seeks to track the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index through a rules-based methodology. The index selects approximately 50 companies from a large- and mid-cap universe based on high free cash flow yields combined with growth filters. The ETF maintains a concentrated portfolio with top holdings typically representing 3% or more each, including names such as Adobe Inc., Expedia Group Inc., and Devon Energy Corporation. Sector allocations emphasize information technology, energy, and health care, each often exceeding 20%. VFLO operates as a passive fund with a net expense ratio of 0.39% and monthly dividend distributions. Its distinguishing feature is the emphasis on free cash flow as a core selection criterion, which may differentiate performance drivers from traditional value or broad-market indexes.

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) Overview

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) tracks the CRSP U.S. Mid Cap Value Index using a full-replication approach. The ETF holds approximately 170-180 mid-cap value stocks, with individual positions generally below 2% of assets. Top holdings include companies such as Cummins Inc., Valero Energy Corp., and Marathon Petroleum Corp. Sector weights are more evenly distributed, with notable allocations to financials, industrials, energy, and utilities. VOE functions as a passive index fund with a net expense ratio of 0.05% and quarterly dividend distributions. Its long operating history since 2006 and low-cost structure provide broad, diversified exposure to the mid-cap value segment of the U.S. equity market.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the U.S. equity value space amid ongoing sector rotation influenced by interest rate expectations, earnings growth in cyclical industries, and capital allocation toward companies demonstrating strong balance sheets. Mid-cap value segments, represented by VOE, often benefit from domestic economic expansion and infrastructure-related spending, while free cash flow-focused strategies like VFLO may gain traction when investors prioritize profitability and cash generation over traditional valuation multiples. Macroeconomic drivers such as commodity price trends and corporate capital expenditure cycles can affect energy and industrial holdings common to both portfolios. Regulatory developments around corporate taxation and energy policy remain relevant considerations for sector allocations in either fund.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VFLO’s concentrated free cash flow screen has positioned it for sensitivity to growth-oriented large-cap names within value parameters, potentially leading to distinct volatility profiles compared to broader indexes. VOE’s diversified mid-cap holdings have historically provided exposure to value recovery themes during periods of economic normalization. Relative positioning shows VFLO with heavier tilts toward technology and health care, which may respond differently to earnings cycles than VOE’s emphasis on financials and industrials. Over broader timeframes, differences in rebalancing frequency and holdings concentration contribute to varying responses to interest rate shifts and sector momentum.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into holdings or comparable strategies may find the platform useful for refining ETF comparisons.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification across holdings and sectors, and established track record, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a higher probability of suitability to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) for investors seeking cost-efficient mid-cap value exposure. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) may appeal in scenarios prioritizing free cash flow metrics and concentrated thematic positioning, though its higher costs and narrower holdings introduce different risk considerations. The assessment remains probabilistic and depends on individual portfolio context.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
VFLO vs. VOE commentary
Sep 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VFLO is a StrongBuy and VOE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOE has more net assets: 24.1B vs. VFLO (11.1B). VFLO has a higher annual dividend yield than VOE: VFLO (35.471) vs VOE (14.559). VFLO was incepted earlier than VOE: VFLO (3 years) vs VOE (20 years). VOE (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than VFLO (0.39). VFLO has a higher turnover VOE (23.00) vs VOE (23.00).
VFLOVOEVFLO / VOE
Gain YTD35.47114.559244%
Net Assets11.1B24.1B46%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.05780%
Turnover149.0023.00648%
Yield1.011.8056%
Fund Existence3 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VFLOVOE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
VFLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VOE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTAP30.740.02
+0.07%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP)
QULL70.67N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL)
OVM20.84-0.04
-0.21%
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM)
DDM63.37-0.23
-0.36%
ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM)
VAW223.49-2.81
-1.24%
Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW)

VFLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFLO has been loosely correlated with ABNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFLO jumps, then ABNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VFLO
1D Price
Change %
VFLO100%
-1.08%
ABNB - VFLO
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
ALGN - VFLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
DOCU - VFLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
PAYX - VFLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
DOX - VFLO
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
More

VOE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOE has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOE jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VOE
1D Price
Change %
VOE100%
-0.59%
KKR - VOE
73%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
FBIN - VOE
73%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
EQH - VOE
72%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
LNC - VOE
71%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
MHK - VOE
71%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
More