Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
VRSGX vs WCMLX
VRSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts VRSGX vs WCMLX
VRSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VRSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VRSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRSGX has more cash in the bank: 596M vs. WCMLX (51.9M). VRSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . VRSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: VRSGX (9 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than VRSGX (1.01). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. VRSGX (18.00). VRSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: VRSGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. VRSGX (-38.16). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. VRSGX (-66.59).
| VRSGX | WCMLX | VRSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.99 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.79 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.923 | 11.410 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 596M | 51.9M | 1,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -38.16 | 17.02 | -224% |
| Returns for 3 years | -45.24 | 32.50 | -139% |
| Returns for 5 years | -66.59 | 3.16 | -2,105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement