Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
VRSGX vs WCMLX
VRSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts VRSGX vs WCMLX
VRSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
VRSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VRSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRSGX has more cash in the bank: 541M vs. WCMLX (47.2M). VRSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . VRSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: VRSGX (9 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than VRSGX (1.01). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. VRSGX (18.00). VRSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: VRSGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. VRSGX (-42.49). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. VRSGX (-70.72).
| VRSGX | WCMLX | VRSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.99 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.79 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.525 | 3.852 | -92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 541M | 47.2M | 1,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -42.49 | 2.81 | -1,515% |
| Returns for 3 years | -50.32 | 23.40 | -215% |
| Returns for 5 years | -70.72 | -7.51 | 942% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement