VWIAX
Price
$63.26
Change
+$0.05 (+0.08%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
47.06B
VWINX
Price
$26.12
Change
+$0.03 (+0.11%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
47.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

VWIAX vs VWINX

VWIAX vs VWINX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Admiral Shares (VWIAX) vs. Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Investor Shares (VWINX)

Key Takeaways

  • VWIAX and VWINX follow the same active balanced strategy, allocating approximately 60-65% to investment-grade fixed income and 35-40% to dividend-focused equities.
  • The funds share nearly identical holdings, sector exposures, and rebalancing practices, with differences primarily in expense ratios and share class accessibility.
  • VWIAX offers a lower expense ratio of 0.15%, providing a structural cost advantage over VWINX at 0.22%.
  • Both funds emphasize income generation through high-quality bonds and dividend-paying stocks, positioning them as moderately conservative allocation vehicles.
  • Structural characteristics such as active management, turnover around 63%, and broad diversification across more than 1,500 holdings remain consistent between the share classes.
  • In the current environment of moderating interest rates and steady equity dividend trends, the lower-cost Admiral Shares class demonstrates relative efficiency for long-term income-focused investors.

Introduction

Investors seeking balanced income exposure often compare share classes within the same underlying strategy. VWIAX and VWINX represent two versions of the Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund, offering nearly identical portfolios but differing in fees and minimum investment requirements. This comparison highlights structural nuances that influence long-term cost efficiency and suitability within moderately conservative allocation mandates.

Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Admiral Shares (VWIAX) Overview

VWIAX employs an active management approach targeting long-term income growth alongside moderate capital appreciation. The fund typically maintains 60-65% in investment-grade fixed income securities, including corporate, Treasury, and mortgage-backed bonds, with the balance in dividend-oriented equities. It holds approximately 1,513 securities, with top positions including Broadcom, Merck & Co., Diamondback Energy, U.S. Treasury Notes, and Johnson & Johnson. Sector allocations emphasize financials, healthcare, and technology within the equity sleeve, while bonds provide defensive ballast. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%, and turnover averages 63%. As an actively managed, non-indexed vehicle, it lacks a traditional benchmark and relies on manager discretion for security selection.

Vanguard Wellesley Income Fund Investor Shares (VWINX) Overview

VWINX mirrors the identical active strategy and portfolio construction as its Admiral counterpart, allocating 60-65% to investment-grade bonds and 35-40% to dividend-focused stocks. It maintains a comparable number of holdings around 1,530, featuring similar top exposures in Broadcom, Merck & Co., and other dividend payers. Sector breakdowns align closely, with emphasis on income-generating sectors. The primary distinction lies in the higher expense ratio of 0.22% and a lower minimum investment threshold suited for smaller accounts. Turnover remains consistent at approximately 63%, reflecting the same active rebalancing methodology applied across both share classes.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The moderately conservative allocation category benefits from a macroeconomic environment featuring declining interest rates and resilient corporate dividend trends. Capital flows into balanced income strategies have remained steady amid expectations for policy easing, supporting demand for high-quality fixed income combined with equity income. Regulatory developments around bond liquidity and tax treatment of dividends continue to influence positioning, while sector risks include interest rate sensitivity in the bond sleeve and potential compression in dividend yields during equity rotations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, both funds have exhibited similar volatility profiles and income generation characteristics due to their shared holdings and allocation framework. Relative positioning favors the lower-cost VWIAX during periods of stable or narrowing spreads in credit markets, as expense differentials compound over longer horizons. Performance dynamics track closely with shifts in Treasury yields, dividend growth from holdings in healthcare and financials, and broader sector rotation away from high-growth equities toward value-oriented income names.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely favor VWIAX over VWINX due to its lower expense ratio, which enhances net returns in a cost-sensitive income strategy while maintaining identical diversification and risk exposure. The probability tilts toward the Admiral Shares class for investors prioritizing long-term efficiency within the same underlying portfolio.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
VWIAX vs. VWINX commentary
Aug 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VWIAX is a StrongBuy and VWINX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VWIAX (47.1B) and VWINX (47.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . VWIAX (3.53) and VWINX (3.46) have matching dividends . VWIAX was incepted earlier than VWINX: VWIAX (25 years) vs VWINX (56 years). VWINX (0.22) is less costly to investors than VWIAX (0.15). VWIAX (63.00) and VWINX (63.00) have comparable annual turnover. VWINX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWIAX: VWINX (3000) vs VWIAX (50000). VWIAX (2.92) and VWINX (2.87) have marching annual gain over last year. VWIAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.68 vs. VWINX (-2.87).
VWIAXVWINXVWIAX / VWINX
Total Expense Ratio0.150.2268%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio0.150.2268%
Fund Existence25 years56 years-
Gain YTD4.0013.995100%
Front LoadN/AN/A-
Min. Initial Investment5000030001,667%
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets47.1B47.1B100%
Annual Yield % from dividends3.533.46102%
Returns for 1 year2.922.87102%
Returns for 3 years16.5116.35101%
Returns for 5 years-2.68-2.8793%
Returns for 10 years21.2320.73102%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEJX79.540.81
+1.03%
Victory RS Small Cap Growth R6
HFMSX27.940.19
+0.68%
Hartford MidCap R4
BLUEX40.550.26
+0.65%
AMG Veritas Global Real Return I
LVOVX22.130.11
+0.50%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R6
APGYX117.110.49
+0.42%
AB Large Cap Growth Advisor