Investors seeking volatility exposure often compare VXX and VXZ because both deliver access to S&P 500 implied volatility through VIX futures, yet they target different segments of the futures curve. These ETNs (Exchange-Traded Notes) do not compete directly with traditional equity or bond ETFs but instead offer alternative strategies for hedging equity portfolios or expressing views on market turbulence. In the current environment of shifting interest-rate expectations and periodic equity-market swings, understanding their structural differences helps investors select the appropriate volatility tool for specific time horizons and risk tolerances.
The iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX) seeks returns linked to the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index Total Return. It maintains a rolling long position in the front-month and second-month VIX futures contracts. The product contains no individual equity holdings and instead derives performance solely from daily rebalancing of these near-term futures. Its expense ratio stands at 0.89%. As a passively managed ETN (Exchange-Traded Note) issued by Barclays, VXX resets its futures exposure daily, which amplifies sensitivity to short-term changes in implied volatility while exposing holders to pronounced negative roll yield when the VIX futures curve remains in contango.
The iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) tracks the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index Total Return by holding a rolling position in the fourth-, fifth-, sixth-, and seventh-month VIX futures contracts. Like VXX, it has no equity holdings and operates as a passively managed ETN (Exchange-Traded Note) with the same 0.89% expense ratio. The longer average maturity of its futures basket results in lower daily roll costs during typical contango conditions, producing a less volatile return profile than short-term counterparts while still providing exposure to forward implied volatility expectations.
Both products operate within the volatility-trading segment of the exchange-traded products market, where demand rises during periods of equity-market uncertainty, geopolitical tension, or macroeconomic surprises. The VIX futures curve frequently exhibits contango, in which longer-dated contracts trade at higher prices than near-term ones, creating a structural headwind for futures-based volatility vehicles. Regulatory oversight of ETNs (Exchange-Traded Notes) emphasizes issuer credit risk, while investor interest centers on using these instruments for tactical hedging rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies. Capital flows into volatility products tend to increase when equity valuations appear elevated or when central-bank policy shifts heighten uncertainty.
Over recent market cycles, VXX has delivered sharper gains during acute volatility spikes but has experienced steeper erosion in calmer periods due to accelerated futures roll costs. VXZ has shown more moderate responses to volatility events while suffering less pronounced decay from contango, resulting in comparatively resilient performance during extended low-volatility regimes. Relative positioning favors VXX for investors expecting near-term turbulence and VXZ for those seeking volatility exposure with reduced structural drag over intermediate horizons. Sector rotation and earnings-driven equity moves influence both, yet their futures-based construction means returns diverge primarily from differences in contract maturity and roll methodology rather than from underlying equity fundamentals.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.
Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to VXZ. Its mid-term futures positioning reduces exposure to the most severe contango decay observed in short-term products, offering a more consistent volatility profile across varied market regimes while maintaining identical cost efficiency and issuer structure. This probabilistic assessment rests on relative durability of exposure rather than short-term price action.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
| VXX | VXZ | VXX / VXZ | |
| Gain YTD | -29.921 | -11.198 | 267% |
| Net Assets | 297M | 38.3M | 775% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | N/A | N/A | - |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| VXX | VXZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 20 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |