Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts WBSNX vs WCMLX
William Blair Small Cap Growth N
Price$28.78
Change-$0.21 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.95M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.78
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.17M
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WBSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBSNX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBSNX has more cash in the bank: 943M vs. WCMLX (45.2M). WBSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . WBSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: WBSNX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WBSNX (1.39). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WBSNX (75.00). WBSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WBSNX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. WBSNX (-6.03). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.35 vs. WBSNX (-2.49).
| WBSNX | WCMLX | WBSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.99 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.069 | 7.621 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 943M | 45.2M | 2,086% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.03 | 5.89 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.85 | 29.59 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.49 | 23.35 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement