Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts WBSNX vs WCMLX
William Blair Small Cap Growth N
Price$27.35
Change-$0.24 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets905.88M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WBSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBSNX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBSNX has more cash in the bank: 906M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). WBSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . WBSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: WBSNX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WBSNX (1.39). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WBSNX (75.00). WBSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WBSNX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. WBSNX (-3.77). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.42 vs. WBSNX (-8.88).
| WBSNX | WCMLX | WBSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.99 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.764 | 0.700 | -681% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 906M | 43.7M | 2,073% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.77 | 7.56 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.10 | 11.25 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.88 | 15.42 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement