Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts WBSNX vs WCMLX
William Blair Small Cap Growth N
Price$29.31
Change+$0.21 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets949.29M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WBSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBSNX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBSNX has more cash in the bank: 949M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). WBSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . WBSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: WBSNX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WBSNX (1.39). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WBSNX (75.00). WBSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WBSNX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. WBSNX (-5.36). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.13 vs. WBSNX (-4.40).
| WBSNX | WCMLX | WBSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.99 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.174 | 5.832 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 949M | 44.8M | 2,118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.36 | 4.77 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.71 | 22.83 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.40 | 17.13 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.47 | N/A | - |