Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts WBSNX vs WCMLX
William Blair Small Cap Growth N
Price$29.10
Change+$0.35 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.95
Change+$0.21 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WBSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBSNX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBSNX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. WCMLX (43.7M). WBSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . WBSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: WBSNX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WBSNX (1.39). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. WBSNX (75.00). WBSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WBSNX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. WBSNX (-6.47). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.53 vs. WBSNX (-9.65).
| WBSNX | WCMLX | WBSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.99 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.759 | 6.843 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 43.7M | 2,336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.47 | 4.73 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.03 | 34.97 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.65 | 12.53 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement