Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WBSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBSNX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBSNX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. WCMLX (52.4M). WBSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . WBSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: WBSNX (26 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WBSNX (1.39). WBSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). WBSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WBSNX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. WBSNX (19.54). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. WBSNX (-17.60).
| WBSNX | WCMLX | WBSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.99 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.443 | 9.375 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 52.4M | 2,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.54 | 25.84 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.14 | 32.13 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.60 | -0.07 | 26,501% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement