Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts WBSNX vs WCMLX
WBSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
WBSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is WBSNX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBSNX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). WBSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . WBSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: WBSNX (27 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WBSNX (1.39). WBSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). WBSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: WBSNX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WBSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. WCMLX (2.81). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. WBSNX (-22.92).
| WBSNX | WCMLX | WBSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.99 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.855 | 3.852 | 360% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 47.2M | 2,458% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 2.81 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.98 | 23.40 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.92 | -7.51 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers